Data | How effective was India\'s COVID-19 lockdown compared to other countries?

Dat

Data | How effective was India's COVID-19 lockdown compared to other countries?

A security guard carries out thermal screening at the South City Mall in Kolkata on June 8.   | Photo Credit: Rajeev Bhatt

Only India reached a stringency level of 100 (highest possible) among select countries with more than 50,000 cases. But due to poor testing, the gains were minimal.

Despite a long and stringent lockdown, cases in India continue to surge. Is poor testing a reason?

How to read the charts?

The graphs show the no. of daily cases (represented by the grey bars, left axis) and the cumulative no. of tests conducted per confirmed case (represented by the blue line, right axis) for select countries with more than 50,000 cases. The reference lines indicate how stringent a nation’s lockdown was on a particular date. The red line indicates when peak lockdown stringency was reached; the orange line indicates when it was relaxed (the govt. was preparing to unlock) and the green line indicates when the lowest stringency was recorded after the peak (further lifting of curbs). Stringency is calculated by the Oxford University based on 17 indicators such as school closures and restrictions in movement.

In all the charts, K indicates '000. For instance, 10K refers to 10,000.

Countries which were relatively worse-off

In these countries, cases were higher during and after unlock than at the start of the lockdown, indicating poor implementation of the lockdown. These nations did not test enough relative to the the size of their outbreak (indicated by a dipping blue line).

Viewing in app? Click to see graph

image/svg+xml Mar. 25 Apr. 19 May 18 10K 10 1 100 INDIA
 

Graph appears incomplete? Click to remove AMP mode.

Viewing in app? Click to see graph

image/svg+xml 10 10 1K 1 PAKISTAN Mar. 26 Apr. 14 Jun. 4 Apr. 11 Apr. 30 May 30 10 10 1K 1 BANGLADESH
 

Viewing in app? Click to see graph

image/svg+xml 10 10 10 10 1K 1K 10K 1 QATAR RUSSIA Mar. 28 Apr. 22 Mar. 30 May 12
 

Only India reached a stringency level of 100 (highest possible) in the list. But due to poor testing, the gains were minimal.

Countries which were relatively bad

In the U.S., Mexico and Chile, cases continue to rise but they did not choose to bring down the stringency (no yellow or green line observed). In Iran, a second wave increased the cases again, but it continued to test enough.

Viewing in app? Click to see graph

image/svg+xml 1K 1K 10 10 10 10K 1 1 MEXICO U.S. Mar. 30 Mar. 21
 

Viewing in app? Click to see graph

image/svg+xml 1K 1K 10 10 10 1 1 CHILE IRAN May 15 Apr. 5 May 26
 

Countries which were relatively good

Cases were lower during and after unlock than at the start of the lockdown, indicating better lockdown implementation. All of them continue to test enough relative to their outbreak sizes (indicated by a rising blue line)

Viewing in app? Click to see graph

image/svg+xml 1K 1K 100 10 10 10 1 1 BELGIUM U.K. Mar. 20 May 11 May 12 Jun. 1
 

Viewing in app? Click to see graph

image/svg+xml 1K 1K 100 100 10 10 1 1 CANADA GERMANY Apr. 1 May 11 Mar. 22 May 3
 

Viewing in app? Click to see graph

image/svg+xml 1K 1K 10 10 100 10 10 1 ITALY TURKEY Apr. 12 May 3 May 25 Apr. 11 Apr. 20
 

A letter from the Editor

Dear reader,

We have been keeping you up-to-date with information on the developments in India and the world that have a bearing on our health and wellbeing, our lives and livelihoods, during these difficult times. To enable wide dissemination of news that is in public interest, we have increased the number of articles that can be read free, and extended free trial periods. However, we have a request for those who can afford to subscribe: please do. As we fight disinformation and misinformation, and keep apace with the happenings, we need to commit greater resources to news gathering operations. We promise to deliver quality journalism that stays away from vested interest and political propaganda.

Support Quality Journalism
Next Story