New Nepal map is based on historical documents\, says top Kathmandu official

Internationa

New Nepal map is based on historical documents, says top Kathmandu official

Political map of Nepal released by the country on May 20, 2020.  

It cannot be termed artificial, says Rajan Bhattarai, Foreign Policy Adviser

Nepal’s new official map is based on historical documents dating back to the early 19th century and cannot be termed artificial, a top representative of Kathmandu said on Thursday.

Rajan Bhattarai, Foreign Policy Adviser to Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli, said the border dispute at Kalapani region had received attention during the Vajpayee years, when a series of meetings was held between top officials of both sides, and the same should be resumed at the earliest to reach a mutually agreed solution.

 

“Our map is not artificial. We are willing to sit across the table and discuss it with our Indian counterparts. We are willing to look at the versions of both sides. Our position is based on the historical documents dating back to the Treaty of Sugauli of 1816, which demarcated the shape of present-day Nepal,” said Dr. Bhattarai to The Hindu, speaking over phone from Kathmandu.

Nepal launched the new official map on Wednesday, which depicts Kalapani, Limpiyadhura and Lipulekh as part of its territory.

Official Spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs Anurag Srivastava had hit out at Nepal’s claims, saying, “Such artificial enlargement of territorial claims will not be accepted by India”. He also urged the Nepali leadership for a dialogue over the issue.

‘Unilateral steps’

Mr. Bhattarai, a key official in the team of Prime Minister Oli, appreciated India’s offer for dialogue and said Nepal too desired an early dialogue to find a solution to the matter but argued that it was India that had been delaying. “We have sent two diplomatic notes to India seeking dialogue at the level of the Foreign Secretaries but India has responded without offering a date for holding the meeting. To make the matter more complicated, they have taken unilateral steps like building of infrastructure on the territory of Kalapani,” he said.

Mr. Bhattarai described the border dispute in the western sector and at Susta in U.P.-Bihar border as unresolved issues from the past. The region of Kalapani, he argued, was offered to India after the 1962 India-China war by the King of Nepal, who wanted to help India’s security concerns due to perceived lingering Chinese threats. “Kalapani was not a part of Nepal-India problems. It was Nepal’s territory that the king had allowed India to use temporarily; our leaders noticed in the 1990s that the region was hosting Indian soldiers and protested and we continue to maintain that the region should be handed back to us.”

The official informed that India and Nepal had held a discussion on the Kalapani region during the tenure of Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, who had shown interest in resolving the issue during discussions with his Nepali counterpart Girija Prasad Koirala during the latter’s visit to Delhi between July 31 and August 6, 2000.

During the visit, both Prime Ministers had directed the Joint Working Group of the Joint Technical Level Boundary Committee to examine the facts of the boundary “in the western sector, including the Kalapani area”.

Mr. Bhattarai said that after Mr. Vajpayee’s decision, National Security Adviser Brajesh Mishra and Nepal’s ambassador Bhesh Bahadur Thapa held a series of meetings till 2003 on the Kalapani issue. He urged India to revive the dialogue on the western sector and address Nepal’s concerns. “Prime Minister Oli has the full support of the people on the boundary issue. Political parties, irrespective of ideological divide, are unitedly supporting the Prime Minister on the issue,” he said.

A letter from the Editor


Dear reader,

We have been keeping you up-to-date with information on the developments in India and the world that have a bearing on our health and wellbeing, our lives and livelihoods, during these difficult times. To enable wide dissemination of news that is in public interest, we have increased the number of articles that can be read free, and extended free trial periods. However, we have a request for those who can afford to subscribe: please do. As we fight disinformation and misinformation, and keep apace with the happenings, we need to commit greater resources to news gathering operations. We promise to deliver quality journalism that stays away from vested interest and political propaganda.

Support Quality Journalism
Next Story