Justice Hall has released the below images, which show how Ciara's fingernail exhibits AJM40, AJM42, AJM46 and AJM48 were received by the UK FSS lab in 2008.
The state alleges AJM40, once combined with AJM42, returned a mixed DNA profile consistent with being from Ciara and Mr Edwards.
A photograph of AJM40 and AJM48 being received by a lab in the UK in 2008.
A photograph of AJM42 and AJM46 being received by a UK lab in 2008.
Ms Barbagallo has said the state has agreed to reshuffle the order of its witnesses pending receiving a list from Mr Yovich highlighting which witnesses he says the defence is not yet ready to cross-examine.
It has left the state now scrambling to bring forward witnesses they did not expect to call until a later stage.
Ms Barbagallo has said the prosecution can read-in some witness statements tomorrow, and then look to have a new witness take the stand by Monday.
Court has adjourned until 10am tomorrow.
At the request from the media, Justice Hall has agreed to release two photographs of the packaging Ciara's fingernails were in when they arrived at the UK lab in 2008.
Justice Stephen Hall
The next witness is Senior Sergeant George Paton, who was involved in the Macro Taskforce between 1998 and 2016, working full-time on the case between 2008 to mid-2016.
There is some legal argument underway as Mr Paton is a witness who will be giving evidence on both DNA and fibre evidence.
Mr Yovich has said he is not ready to cross-examine Mr Paton about his fibre-related evidence, due to the late submissions of fibre evidence reports to this trial that he is yet to consider.
Ms Barbagallo is opposed to witnesses being called to give their evidence-in-chief, and then "months later" being recalled to be cross-examined.
"Giving evidence in this trial for any witness is nerve-racking, it's heavily scrutinised, and this witness ought to be able to give his evidence and be cross-examined, in fairness to everybody," she said.
Mr Yovich has disagreed.
"I want to ensure the trial proceeds for no longer than it has to obviously, but my overriding concern is fairness to my client, and fairness to my client is to know what the evidence will be and have time to deal with it," he said.
In light of Mr Yovich's position, which Ms Barbagallo said she had not been made aware of until now, the prosecution has requested Mr Paton's evidence be deferred.
This application would also mean former Macro Taskforce boss Jim Stanbury's evidence would also be delayed.
Justice Hall has ordered a brief adjournment for the two parties to "have a chat" and work out how best to call the witnesses.
Mr Yovich has now moved onto some mitochondrial DNA testing undertaken on some of Ciara's hair slides by Ms Evans in 2010.
The testing was carried out on hairs found on drop sheets that Ciara's body was laid out on at the crime scene and at the beginning of her post-mortem, and hairs found on her underwear.
Mr Yovich has pointed out a number of the hairs tested were found to not be Ciara's.
Mr Yovich: What is the minimum number of individuals that [these hairs] could have come from?
Ms Evans: Each one was probably a separate individual ... potentially nine [people].
In earlier evidence, Mr Yovich cross-examined technicians involved in the post-mortem on Ciara's body and questioned that in footage of the examination, a number of people appeared to lean over the sheeting, and even walk on it.
Mr Yovich has now revealed a sample of Mr Edwards' hair was taken and tested to compare to the 2008 hair tests, to see if he was a match.
Mr Yovich: Does that report conclude that those hairs distinguishable from Ms Glennon are also distinguishable from Mr Edwards?
Ms Evans: Yes.
Mr Yovich: Do you concur in conclusion that the hairs in your tables, that Mr Edwards can be excluded as a contributor?
Ms Evans: Yes.
Mr Yovich has begun his cross-examination of Ms Evans and is asking about the anti-contamination processes at her Birmingham lab.
He has pointed out the UK labs were "ultra-clean labs" with higher air pressure and monitored airflow, and specialised cabinets to avoid contamination.
He also pointed out the lab used different areas to conduct different stages of a DNA extraction, in order to further reduce the risk of contamination.
Mr Yovich is arguing Mr Edwards' DNA - which had been stored at Pathwest as part of the Karrakatta rape exhibits since 1995 - somehow cross-contaminated Ciara's fingernail exhibits.
"We accept ... that the scientific literature suggests the chance of contamination is remote but secondary transfer is known and documented in the literature," he said in his opening address.
"Your Honour will have to consider the possibility of cross-contamination with other exhibits at Pathwest that did have the accuseds' DNA on them."
Secondary DNA transfer is where DNA is transferred to an object or person through an intermediate, such as a piece of laboratory equipment.
Before Ms Evans resumes her evidence, the court has flagged it may be necessary to have a break from the trial after the DNA evidence is completed in the next week or two.
The break would allow the prosecution to consider a defence report relating to the state's fibre evidence, which was allowed to be submitted to the trial late.
The fibre evidence will begin after the DNA evidence.
It will resume at 2.15pm.
Ms Barbagallo is now taking Ms Evans through some further testing of Macro items carried out by the UK lab in November 2010.
A document marked "highly protected" shown on the court screens shows 178 exhibits were sent by Macro Taskforce detective Jim Stanbury, including scrapings from Ciara's T-shirt (AMJ33).
The T-shirt scrapings, collected from the FBI in 1999 and placed into a petri dish, would go on to have 11 blue polyester fibres retrieved in 2012 which the state alleges match Mr Edwards' work-issued Telstra trousers.
Ms Barbagallo is taking Ms Evans through this evidence for the purpose of showing the chain of possession, or continuity, of the T-shirt scrapings while they were in the UK.
Following the DNA testing of the fingernails, it was discovered in January 2009 that the male DNA recovered allegedly matched that of an unknown male profile stored in the Pathwest DNA database.
The unknown male profile belonged to the perpetrator of a rape carried out in 1995.
In 2019, Mr Edwards confessed to the crime, where he abducted a 17-year-old girl from Claremont as she walked home alone and raped her in the Karrakatta Cemetery.
Ms Barbagallo is now asking Ms Evans about DNA testing carried out in April 2009 on some rape kit swabs taken from the Karrakatta cemetery rape victim.
The rape kit swabs were tested in the UK using what's known as a Y Filer DNA kit.
The results match Mr Edwards' DNA profile, which police obtained when he was arrested in 2016.
The results of DNA taken from the rape kit swabs in Pathwest in 1999 also matched Mr Edwards' profile.
Defence lawyer Paul Yovich has questioned the relevance of asking Ms Evans about the UK lab's testing of the rape kit swabs, given Mr Edwards had already confessed to.
Ms Barbagallo: I don't know what the defence is quite frankly. I don't know where they are going with the DNA ... so it may be that this has no role to play, but it may be that it does ... quite frankly, it's a guessing game and I don't want to be in a position at the end of the prosecution case to say, 'I can now see the relevance of that'.
Justice Stephen Hall has agreed to let the evidence be heard, saying, "If there was any question raised as to the reliability of the [Karrakatta victim] samples as being that of the accused ... the Y Filer test is a test that confirms and reinforces the conclusion reached using other tests, that the DNA is his".
Ms Evans said it was decided low copy number DNA testing would be carried out on the two combined fingernail samples as "it was anticipated there was only a low level of DNA inside" the pots.
Court has broken for morning tea and will resume at 11.35am.