Negative Clinical Results; The Sun May Set for Conatus

21:34 EDT 24 Jun 2019 | Biotech Watcher


Conatus Pharmaceuticals (CNAT) announced the failure of its lead candidate, emricasan, in two separate clinical trials in NASH cirrhosis. With unusual candor, the management team stated it was “game over” for Emricasan.[1] The company will fulfill its obligations to Novartis for the partnership to create combination therapy, but the prior hope for emricasan as a monotherapy is over.

Company Announcements

If you’re interested in details, you should read the announcements.
ENCORE-LF and ENCORE-PH Phase 2b Clinical Trials in NASH Cirrhosis
Conatus to Explore Strategic Alternatives and Implement Restructuring Plan

Thoughts

The gamble came down to this: does interdicting caspase-directed inflammation enough to create a reasonable monotherapy for NASH?
The answer is “No”. It’s not enough for commercial application as a monotherapy.

Why Emricasan?

Caspases are an extremely effective killer of cells. It has amazingly fast and potent cellular toxicity. We saw it used to kill dysfunctional and cancer cells in mice and primates.
…and emricasan is really good at halting the caspase cascade.
We talked to executives and scientists at other biotechs; they liked the team and the drug.

Why Not Emricasan?

Here’s what we wrote in our recent update on Conatus:
“Emricasan is a strong anti-inflammation, anti-apoptotic drug. We’ve seen too much evidence to support it. NASH is a “dirty disease” and we’ve had our doubts that it is wholly amenable to one drug. That’s why even the successful drugs only target meaningful subsets.
Does emricasan treat a necessary component that is insufficient alone for treating the range of NASH?
For those who have a strong science element in their investment charter, the key questions involve: does inflammation play an essential role in the NASH disease process?
The answer is likely yes.
Is it enough for Novartis to still make a serious run for emricasan? Is caspase inhibition the way to go?
The answer is: we don’t know. The animal work at Conatus and Novartis remains hidden. Unlike prior work, the combination work remains opaque.”[2]
In the meantime, very recent literature underscores the difficulty with treating NASH. It’s more complicated than previously thought and it was already complicated enough! We wonder whether it should be viewed as only one catch-all disease. Although the current view is to differentiate by stage of disease, we think that someday, there will be important markers. This is the case with cancer.

Final Thoughts

Although combination therapy is a different animal, the emricasan star is dimmed. We should not bank on something that is so opaque. We would not be surprised if emricasan is a good combo therapy component, but there’s no evidence to support it.
We wish the management team well. They believed in their drug and when it didn’t work, they pulled no punches. They are exploring alternatives and their future is unknown. It isn't going to be easy.
We may write one more post-mortem.
(At the time this post was written, one or more BioWatch staff held a position in CNAT)
This blog post is from The Biotech Watcher:
And about us, see http://alanhobbes.blogspot.com/2014/12/welcome-to-my-personal-thoughts-about.html


[1]We designed the ENCORE program to give emricasan an opportunity to achieve its potential through a series of clinical trials tailored to specific patient populations encompassing a broad range of chronic liver disease,” said Steven J. Mento, Ph.D., President, Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of Conatus. “We are disappointed that emricasan failed to meet the expectations established in prior preclinical and clinical studies, but confident that the ENCORE trials provided a fair evaluation of emricasan’s lack of efficacy in these patient populations.”
David T. Hagerty, M.D., Executive Vice President of Clinical Development at Conatus, said, “We offer sincere thanks to the patients, principal investigators, collaborators, service providers and investors who enabled the development of emricasan. We offer hope that the scientific and clinical communities will build on the knowledge gained from these efforts in their continued pursuit of new treatment alternatives for chronic liver disease.”
[2]There is evidence that emricasan paired with an FXR targeting drug synergistically treats animal models. Novartis may indeed be seeing positive preclinical results but we will not encourage this line of thinking. It’s still a long way to establishing a likelihood. See Zhou et al. (2019) Combined obeticholic acid and apoptosis inhibitor treatment alleviates liver fibrosis. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 9, 526-536.

Original Article: Negative Clinical Results; The Sun May Set for Conatus

More From BioPortfolio on "Negative Clinical Results; The Sun May Set for Conatus"