Rafale documents not stolen, petitioners used photocopies: Attorney General Venugopal
PTI | Updated: Mar 8, 2019, 20:25 ISTHighlights
- I am told the opposition has alleged that it was argued (in SC) that the files had been stolen from the defence ministry. This is wholly incorrect: K K Venugopal
- Official sources said the AG's use of word stolen was probably "stronger" and could have been avoided
Rafale fighter jet (AFP photo)NEW DELHI: Attorney General K K Venugopal on Friday claimed the
Rafale documents were not stolen
+ from the defence ministry and that what he meant in his submission before the Supreme Court was that petitioners in the application used "photocopies of the original" papers, deemed secret by the government.
His comments in the apex court on Wednesday that Rafale fighter jet deal documents were stolen caused a political row, with Congress president Rahul Gandhi targeting the government + over stealing of such sensitive papers and seeking a criminal investigation.
"I am told the opposition has alleged that it was argued (in SC) that the files had been stolen from the defence ministry. This is wholly incorrect. The statement that files have been stolen is wholly incorrect," he told PTI, in an apparent damage-control exercise.
Venugopal said the application filed by Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie and Prashant Bhushant, seeking from the court a review of its verdict + dismissing pleas for a probe into against the Rafale deal, had annexed three documents which were photocopies of the original.
Official sources said the AG's use of word stolen was probably "stronger" and could have been avoided.
The government had also warned The Hindu newspaper with a case under Official Secrets Act for publishing articles based on these documents.
His comments in the apex court on Wednesday that Rafale fighter jet deal documents were stolen caused a political row, with Congress president Rahul Gandhi targeting the government + over stealing of such sensitive papers and seeking a criminal investigation.
"I am told the opposition has alleged that it was argued (in SC) that the files had been stolen from the defence ministry. This is wholly incorrect. The statement that files have been stolen is wholly incorrect," he told PTI, in an apparent damage-control exercise.
Venugopal said the application filed by Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie and Prashant Bhushant, seeking from the court a review of its verdict + dismissing pleas for a probe into against the Rafale deal, had annexed three documents which were photocopies of the original.
Official sources said the AG's use of word stolen was probably "stronger" and could have been avoided.
The government had also warned The Hindu newspaper with a case under Official Secrets Act for publishing articles based on these documents.
Download The Times of India News App for Latest India News.
All Comments ()+^ Back to Top
Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by marking them offensive. Let's work together to keep the conversation civil.
HIDE