\'Leaving Neverland\' scores more viewers in UK than US

'Leaving Neverland' scores more viewers in UK than US

IANS  |  London 

"Leaving Neverland", the controversial two-part documentary featuring two men accusing late of Pop of sexually abusing them as children, got more eyeballs in the UK than in the US.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, the broadcast of the first part of the documentary on in the US, drew 1.29 million viewers, the third largest audience for a documentary this decade. The second instalment pulled in 927,000 viewers.

There have been serious repercussions of the documentary as an Australian radio station joined three in and two in to pull out MJ songs, and removed his statue.

MJ's nephew says his uncle would be "crying" over the allegations made by and in the "Leaving Neverland" documentary.

Taj said the allegations are "hurtful" but believes they won't have a lasting effect on the singer's legacy.

"I think it's temporary in terms of the stain. First of all I believe the truth will come out," he told a radio channel, reported

Meanwhile, fans of gathered outside Channel 4's to protest the broadcaster's move. His supporters have called the documentary an unjustified smear on the singer's reputation.

Defending its decision to air the documentary, Channel 4 said that showing "Leaving Neverland" was in the public interest and that viewers could reach their own conclusions.

According to The Guardian, Michael Jackson's estate is now engaged in a campaign of adverts, lawsuits and interviews in an attempt to salvage his image after the documentary's screening.

Jackson's estate - which has made $2.1 billion since his death in 2009 and is run by John McClain, a co-executor with Jackson's former - originally tried to block the release of the documentary by contacting Channel 4 and issuing a $100 million lawsuit against HBO, which broadcast the film last weekend in the US.

The estate said the documentary is "the kind of tabloid character assassination endured in life, and now in death", and added that "the film takes uncorroborated allegations that supposedly happened 20 years ago and treats them as fact".

--IANS

rb/bg

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Thu, March 07 2019. 18:08 IST