Renault has confirmed the appointment of a new chairman and a separate new CEO after Carlos Ghosn resigned while facing financial misconduct charges.
Former Michelin CEO Jean-Dominique Senard has been named director and chairman, while Ghosn's former deputy, Thierry Bolloré, takes over as CEO in a move to new structure less reliant on one individual.
The French government earlier revealed that Ghosn decided to resign after reports he would be ousted from the French car maker in an emergency board meeting today. The decision is believed to be an attempt to heal the rift between allies Nissan and Renault that has developed since the scandal broke.
A statement issued by Renault confirmed Senard "will be the main contact person for the Japanese partner and the other Alliance partners for any discussion on the Alliance's organisation and evolution". It continued: "He will propose to the Board of Directors any new Alliance agreement that he considers useful for Renault's future."
The architect and former boss of the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance is still detained in Japan, facing charges of serious financial misconduct. His resignation comes two months after his arrest and subsequent dismissal from Nissan.
Ghosn's multi-million-pound misconduct allegations: the latest
Nissan and Mitsubishi claimed last week in a joint statement that Ghosn received £6.9 million in 'improper' payments without consulting the board.
Ghosn has had several bail applications denied after being indicted on charges of serious financial misconduct, aggravated breach of trust and understating his income for three years. New allegations come directly from two of his former employers, claiming he failed to consult the board when receiving payments from Nissan-Mitsubishi BV (NMBV), a Netherlands-based joint venture set up to explore greater collaboration within the group.
Join the debate
xxxx
How the mighty has fallen
Some defence that, "Ghosn said he did ask the company to take on the collateral" they just took on £13 million of personal losses as a favour.
Looking forward to hearing the details although looking at past Jananese court cases they seem to involve a pay off to minimise prision sentences.
typos1 - Just can’t respect opinion
mpls
The prosecutors also need to
The prosecutors also need to ask the defence to cough up some documents the defendant asked his daughter to remove from one of his apartments.. possibly some incriminating info that he doesnt want revealed !
Peter Cavellini
It’s a big Brush,but.....
Let’s face it, he’s not the first, he won’t be the last.....
Peter Cavellini.
FM8
I bet he's learning the rusty
jason_recliner
FM8 wrote:
I had to google "rusty trombone". Thanks Wikipedia!
Luckily for Carlos, he's not exactly a pretty man.
FM8
jason_recliner wrote:
Neither is FMS, that doesn't stop them giving it a go.
FMS
FM8 wrote:
Puzzling then for your boyfriend, that you pay me SO MUCH attention...I have no objection to that...you are SUCH an outrageous flirt. Heh heh.
FM8
FMS wrote:
I like it...
scrap
Meanwhile, Renault’s CEO
Meanwhile, Renault’s CEO remains behind bars in Japan. Surely this situation is untenable. They are clearly reluctant to fire him but why hasn’t he temporarily stood down until the case has been heard and a decision reached?
Broughster
Anyone for presumed innocent?
It seems to me that everyone on this forum has rushed to the judgement that Ghosn is guilty. So far all we have heard are the charges against him, none of the detail and certainly no actual evidence. These charges have been eked out in a manner (which would be considered illegal in the UK) designed to keep him behind bars for as long as possible and damage his defence. Why should Renault fire him? He hasn't been found guilty in Japan and I'm not sure that some of the things he is accused of are even crimes in France or the UK. He runs 3 car companies on 2 continents and has a Brazilian/Lebanese background....of course his tax affairs will be complex. Did anyone notice that the two arrested Directors are both non-Japanese? It would have been impossible for them to commit fraud or act improperly without the acquiesence or involvement of several Japanese colleagues. Why are isn't the Finance Director or Financial Controller implicated? Have a look at Michael Woodford's book on his time at Olympia if you want to see how corporate Japan deals with outsiders.
Pages
Add your comment