Kanakadurga, a woman who entered Sabarimala earlier this month has been locked out of her house by her in-laws, stated several media reports.
A week earlier, she had been attacked by her mother-in-law, who allegedly hit her on the head with a wooden plank, angered at her decision to enter Sabarimala.
The woman said has filed a complaint with the District Violence Protection Officer after her in-laws locked her out and a court order is awaited.
The police said that after the woman returned to her home, she found that her husband had shut down shutters and left the place with his mother and two children.
Earlier, the Supreme Court directed the Kerala Police on Friday to provide round-the-clock security to two women who had entered the Sabarimala temple.
Kanakadurga, 44, who had been in hiding after the darshan of Lord Ayyappa at the Sabarimala shrine due to security reasons said she was assaulted when she reached home.
She suffered head injuries and was admitted to a government hospital at Perinthalmanna in northern Malappuram district.
"My mother-in-law beat me up severely with the wooden plank," Kanakadurga had told TV channels from the hospital. However, her aged mother-in-law also got admitted to the hospital later alleging that Kanakadurga had assaulted her.
The Supreme Court Tuesday said it may not start hearing pleas seeking a review of the Sabarimala verdict, allowing women of all age groups to enter the temple, till January 30 as one of the judges is on medical leave.
On September 28 last year, a five-judge Constitution Bench, headed by the then Chief Justice Dipak Misra, in a 4:1 verdict had paved the way for entry of women of all ages into the Sabarimala temple saying the ban amounted to gender discrimination.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said that Justice Indu Malhotra, the lone woman judge of the five-judge constitution bench which delivered the verdict allowing all women inside the Sabarimala temple, is on leave till
January 30 "due to some medical reasons".Justice Malhotra had delivered the dissenting judgement in the case.
Lawyer Mathews J Nedumpara, appearing for the National Ayyappa Devotees' Association (NADA), mentioned the matter before the bench, which also comprised Justices L Nageswara Rao and Sanjiv Khanna, and sought urgent listing for hearing the pleas seeking review of the verdict.
The court said that the next date of hearing would be fixed only after Justice Malhotra rejoins.
A five-judge Constitution bench comprisiing the CJI, Justices R F Nariman, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Justice Malhotra was scheduled to hear in open court the review petitions from today.
Earlier also, the court had said that it may not start the hearing from January 22 as Justice Malhotra would not be available.
The remarks had come when Nedumpara on January 15 had mentioned the plea and had sought live streaming of the proceedings in the Sabarimala case.
NADA had sought live streaming of the hearing saying it would ensure that "justice is made accessible to common man".
Prior to this, the apex court had decided to hear in open court the review petitions against the verdict.There are around 48 petitions seeking review of the judgement and they were filed following the violent protests in favour and against the verdict.