Large online marketplaces may seek extension of Feb 1 deadline for new FDI rules: sources

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Large marketplaces could approach the government seeking extension of the February 1 deadline as compliance with the recent changes would require at least 4-5 months at operational level, according to multiple sources.

The rules were announced on December 26, giving companies just a month to execute these changes, which in many cases would require re-working existing partnerships and even, overhauling business models, the added.

Another said companies are studying the recently announced amendments in detail and are likely to approach the government in coming weeks.

These representatives did not wish to be identified as the matter is sensitive.

Emails sent to and did not elicit any response.

The government's move to tighten norms has hit and the hardest as the new with foreign investment to sell products of companies where they hold stakes as well as ban exclusive marketing arrangements.

Another provision states that the inventory of a vendor will be seen as controlled by a marketplace, if over 25 per cent of the vendor's purchases are from the marketplace entity, including the latter's wholesale unit.

The move is aimed at ensuring that the marketplace entity or its related companies cannot control inventory under the FDI rules.

Another industry watcher pointed out that clarity is required on this provision as it would be difficult to find out whether a vendor is, indeed, in compliance.

The explained that the vendor may not be willing to share the books and accounts with the marketplace and in such a scenario, the latter will find it difficult to determine if the rules are being adhered to.

The government, on Thursday, had clarified that private labels were not banned from being sold on marketplaces. One of the big players, however, stated that private labels are a small component of the business and that the government needs to address the larger issues at hand.

Private labels -- often sold at lower prices -- allow e-commerce companies to control quality and even offers better margins than big, established brands. Over the last few years, have introduced private labels across a variety of categories including apparel, home furnishing and grocery.

Overall, the amendment of the have drawn a mixed reaction. While had suggested that government should follow a consultative process in framing rules that have long-term implications, had said it has "always operated in compliance with the laws of the land" and is evaluating the new guidelines "to engage as necessary with the government to gain clarity".

The US-Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) had dubbed the rules as "regressive" and said the changes would harm consumers, create unpredictability and have a negative impact on the growth of fledgling in

The Forum had also asserted that "it is not the government's business to micromanage businesses" and alleged that the amendments announced came out without any consultation and are akin to changing rules in the middle of the game.

Smaller players such as and had, however, welcomed the move saying the development will "close the back door" that has been "blatantly exploited" by larger companies and provide a level-playing field for all.

said the introduction of these new norms is an acknowledgement that "all the major foreign players have been consistently violating the spirit of the policy from day one".

said these changes would enable a level-playing field for all sellers, helping them leverage the reach of e-commerce.

Traders' body CAIT had asked the government to ensure a level-playing field for all traders and not bring any changes that could give an upper hand to big players in the sector.

According to the current policy, 100 per cent FDI is permitted in It is prohibited in inventory-based model.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Fri, January 04 2019. 17:15 IST