Person facing trial for 35 years a punishment in itself, says SC
PTI | Updated: Jan 4, 2019, 19:22 ISTHighlights
- The apex court observed this while hearing an appeal filed by an accused who has challenged the Calcutta HC verdict upholding a trial court's order permitting examination of a prosecution witness in the case.
- This is a 35-year-old case. You are not able to produce this witness before the court. Fair trial and speedy trial is for the accused also. That too, you are the CBI," the bench told the counsel representing the CBI.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday pulled up the CBI for its failure to produce a witness before the lower court in a 1983 case and said that facing trial for over three decades was itself "a punishment" for a person.
The apex court observed this while hearing an appeal filed by an accused who has challenged the Calcutta high court verdict upholding a trial court's order permitting examination of a prosecution witness in the case.
"In India, a person facing trial for 35 years is itself a punishment," said a bench comprising Justices A K Sikri and S Abdul Nazeer.
"This is a case of 1983 and we are in 2019 now. This is a 35-year-old case. You (CBI) are not able to produce this witness before the court. Fair trial and speedy trial is for the accused also. That too, you are the CBI," the bench told the counsel representing the probe agency.
The CBI's counsel said examination of a prosecution witness, a hand writing expert, was crucial for the case.
The case was lodged in August 1983 under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) relating to cheating, criminal conspiracy, using forged documents and under provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
The trial court in Kolkata had in December 2014 permitted examination of the hand writing expert as a prosecution witness after which the accused had challenged the order in the high court.
The high court had refused to interfere with the lower court order.
The apex court observed this while hearing an appeal filed by an accused who has challenged the Calcutta high court verdict upholding a trial court's order permitting examination of a prosecution witness in the case.
"In India, a person facing trial for 35 years is itself a punishment," said a bench comprising Justices A K Sikri and S Abdul Nazeer.
"This is a case of 1983 and we are in 2019 now. This is a 35-year-old case. You (CBI) are not able to produce this witness before the court. Fair trial and speedy trial is for the accused also. That too, you are the CBI," the bench told the counsel representing the probe agency.
The CBI's counsel said examination of a prosecution witness, a hand writing expert, was crucial for the case.
The case was lodged in August 1983 under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) relating to cheating, criminal conspiracy, using forged documents and under provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
The trial court in Kolkata had in December 2014 permitted examination of the hand writing expert as a prosecution witness after which the accused had challenged the order in the high court.
The high court had refused to interfere with the lower court order.
Download The Times of India News App for Latest India News.
FROM AROUND THE WEB
more from times of india News
LATEST VIDEOS
All Comments ()+^ Back to Top
Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by marking them offensive. Let's work together to keep the conversation civil.
HIDE