SC rejects review plea against NJAC ruling
PTI | Dec 2, 2018, 05:40 ISTNEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has dismissed a plea seeking review of its 2015 verdict striking down the NJAC Act and another related law, which had led to revival of the collegium system for appointment of judges in higher judiciary.
The National Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2014 would have accorded a major role to the executive in appointing judges to the higher judiciary.
A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said there was a delay of 470 days in filing the review petition and there was no merit in it.
“There is a delay of 470 days in filing the present review petition, for which no satisfactory explanation has been offered. The review petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay alone,” the bench, also comprising justices Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph (since retired), A M Khanwilkar and Ashok Bhushan, said in its November 27 order.
“Even otherwise, we have carefully gone through the review petition and the connected papers. We do not find any merit in the same. The review petition is dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits,” the bench said.
The review petition was filed by National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms for re-consideration of the verdict delivered by a five-judge Constitution bench.
The review plea had claimed the 2015 judgement of the top court was “unconstitutional and void”.
The apex court had on October 16, 2015 struck down the NJAC Act, 2014 to replace the 22-year-old collegium system of judges appointing judges.
The National Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2014 would have accorded a major role to the executive in appointing judges to the higher judiciary.
A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said there was a delay of 470 days in filing the review petition and there was no merit in it.
“There is a delay of 470 days in filing the present review petition, for which no satisfactory explanation has been offered. The review petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay alone,” the bench, also comprising justices Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph (since retired), A M Khanwilkar and Ashok Bhushan, said in its November 27 order.
“Even otherwise, we have carefully gone through the review petition and the connected papers. We do not find any merit in the same. The review petition is dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits,” the bench said.
The review petition was filed by National Lawyers Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms for re-consideration of the verdict delivered by a five-judge Constitution bench.
The review plea had claimed the 2015 judgement of the top court was “unconstitutional and void”.
The apex court had on October 16, 2015 struck down the NJAC Act, 2014 to replace the 22-year-old collegium system of judges appointing judges.
Download The Times of India News App for Latest India News.
All Comments ()+^ Back to Top
Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by marking them offensive. Let's work together to keep the conversation civil.
HIDE