Motsoaledi says National Heath Insurance is about equality, not votes

Government is not trying to solicit votes through the implementation of National Health Insurance (NHI), Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi told a University of Stellenbosch Business School event in Cape Town on Thursday.

In June government gazetted the NHI bill as well as the Medical Schemes Amendment Bill for public comment. NHI is a proposed state-run health financing system that aims to pool funds to provide access to quality health services for all South Africans regardless of their economic status. The Medical Schemes Bill is aligned to the NHI Bill seeking to achieve universal health care.

President Cyril Ramaphosa previously said that all South Africans will be covered by NHI by 2025. 

Motsoaledi on Thursday argued that, in his experience of attending the World Health Assembly – an annual gathering of global health ministers in Geneva, Switzerland, none of the countries present had used universal health coverage as an "election ticket".

The minister added that, in his opinion, 90% of South Africa's healthcare system is designed for "well-to-do" people, and not poor people.

• READ: NHI: What next for your medical aid scheme?

No medical textbooks would prescribe different treatments for diseases like cancer based on the socio-economic status of a patient, said the minister. 

Speaking of the world's first heart transplant performed by Dr Chris Barnard in 1967 in Cape Town, Motsoaledi said that economic status of the patient Louis Washkansky's did not determine whether he could get a heart or not. "All he [Washkansky] knew was that he is sick and he knew he needed a new heart. It was not a question of whether he had medical aid, his bank balance or if he had a farm to mortgage."

It was simply a question of his health, which no one debated, said Motsoaledi.

Today, however, socio-economic status determines the quality of healthcare people have access to, he said.

• READ: Scathing new report slams confusing and expensive medical aid schemes

In addition, he said that people have been conditioned to believe that quality healthcare must be expensive.

One of the findings of the Health Market Inquiry's report, released earlier this year, is that there is "something wrong" with the cost of private healthcare in SA, said the minister. "People associate good healthcare to exorbitant pricing. That is unrealistic," he said.

And while there is mismanagement and corruption in the healthcare system, he argued that these problems are secondary to the primary problem of inequality.

Two-tier system 

The minister supported his argument around healthcare inequality by noting that SA spends 8.7% of GDP on health. Of this, he said private sector spends 4.5% of the country's GDP to provide care for 16% of the population, while the public sector spends 4.2% to provide healthcare for 84% of the population.

People believe that by "some miracle" without corruption and mismanagement the state can provide quality healthcare for 86% of the population on 4.2% of GDP, when 16% of the population receives healthcare on 4.5% of GDP, he said. "This is gross inequality."

Motsoaledi also said that, between 2015 and 2018, state subsidies and medical tax credits provided by the SA Revenue Service to private healthcare users grew by R11bn from R46.8bn to R57bn. Meanwhile, Treasury had made cuts of R9bn to the public health sector given the economic downturn, he said.

• READ: Everyone will be covered by NHI by 2025 - Ramaphosa

Motsoaledi ended his address by saying that NHI could not be costed. On the question of affordability, the minister rather asked if the country could afford not to provide healthcare. He said that, in 1996, if HIV treatment had to be priced, it would have not rolled out. "It would have been billions that scare you."

* Sign up to Fin24's top news in your inbox: SUBSCRIBE TO FIN24 NEWSLETTER