US nuclear treaty ultimatum about China as much as Russia

AFP  |  Washington 

By announcing its intent to withdraw from a decades-old treaty, the is targeting Russia, which it says violated the bilateral deal -- but also China, which is developing arms that are banned under it.

At issue is Moscow's new 9M729 ground-based missile system, which says has a reach that exceeds 500 kilometers (300 miles) -- a claim the Kremlin denies.

"has not unfortunately honored the agreement, so we're going to terminate the agreement and we're going to pull out," US said Saturday at a campaign rally in

Trump did not say whether a new treaty could be negotiated, but he has repeatedly in recent days pointed the finger of blame at both and Beijing, saying the US would develop its own weapons until they stop.

"Until people come to their senses, we will build it up," Trump told reporters Monday at the White House, referring to the US arsenal.

"It's a threat to whoever you want. And it includes and it includes and it includes anybody else that wants to play that game."

For several years, has accused Russia of violating the Treaty, which banned an entire class of nuclear and conventional missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometers (310-3,400 miles).

The accord helped end a crisis begun in the 1980s with the deployment of Soviet SS-20 nuclear warheads targeting Western capitals.

US was dispatched to for emergency talks, where he said there would be wider consultations with "other" participants.

He told Moscow's Echo radio that "friends" in and could be involved.

For John Lee, a senior fellow at the conservative think tank who specializes in defense strategy, "the situation vis-a-vis China, uninhibited by any agreement, is very different and far more pressing" than that of Russia.

In recent years, has developed "land-based intermediate missiles (capable of carrying conventional and nuclear payloads)," Lee said in a column published Monday on CNN's website.

About 95 percent of the missiles available to the would violate the Treaty if were a signatory, Lee charges.

On the issue, the and the are on the same wavelength. "is completely aligned with the and he's in close contact with the on this," said

In its latest published in February 2018, the said: "In the nuclear context, the most significant Russian violation involves a system banned" by the Treaty.

But the document also refers to missiles developed by China, which has in recent years sought to assert its military supremacy in

At the start of October, Mattis put Russia on notice that its continued alleged violation of the arms treaty would not be ignored.

"Russia must return to compliance with the INF Treaty or the US will need to respond to its cavalier disregard for the treaty's specific limits," Mattis said after a meeting of NATO defense ministers in

"Make no mistake -- the current situation with Russia in blatant violation of this treaty is untenable." In a sign that the Pentagon was preparing for an INF withdrawal for months, the new Missile Defense Review -- US policy on ballistic missiles -- has not yet been published, despite its expected arrival in early 2018.

For months, the Defense Department has repeatedly said the policy document will be available "in a few weeks." When asked about the MDR, Manning said he had no precise publication date to announced, but he highlighted that "all factors will be taken into account before is released.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Tue, October 23 2018. 03:25 IST