Ours is the Power model. There are cheaper Pure and Progressive trim levels with smaller wheels, painted bumpers and less equipment, but as soon as we started enquiring, it became clear that UK buyers like the niceties such as our car’s 18in alloys, standard Merc 7-speed automatic transmission, various chrome body bits, folding mirrors, rain sensing wipers and top-spec climate control.
We decided to collect the pick-up from a dealership, choosing a new Merc place, Rygor Commercials in Gloucester, which was as classy as any new car dealership. We met two of the management team, Dominic Ilbury and Richard Morrissey, who unveiled our gleaming white machine (a nice touch). Dominic talked me through the controls and switches, very logically Mercedes.
Bearing in mind I’d never driven one of these big pick-ups before, the initial driving experience was surprisingly easy and reassuring. It felt like one of the taller SUVs, with a comfortable and well-equipped interior to match.
The X-Class will fit the average covered or underground car park and it’s not excessively wide, either. Even the wheelbase is only 233mm (less than a foot) longer than a Land Rover Discovery. The main thing you’ve got to cope with is the 5340mm overall length, yet even that isn’t turning out to be the bugbear I thought it might be.
The Big X is only a few inches longer than the current crop of long-wheelbase luxury saloons (Jaguar’s XJ is typical at 5255mm). Even the turning circle’s just about okay.
The X-Class has a Nissan-Renault-sourced 2.3-litre four-cylinder engine that I reckoned might be a bit agricultural, but it’s a twin-turbo unit with 187bhp on tap, and at anything more than idle it’s torquey, commendably quiet and doesn’t vibrate more than any four-pot car.
In fact, one thing I’ve quickly come to depend on from the X-Class is smooth, quiet progress. The silky automatic ’box works perfectly with this engine, cruising like a saloon on motorways. It’ll even bolt quite well out of roundabouts if you insist, though acceleration times are modest.
The steering and handling take some getting used to. This is a body-on-frame machine, so there are body tremors over bumps you don’t expect at first. It’s light over the rear end, too, so even with the independent rear working well, there’s still an occasional tendency to wheel hop.
On the other hand, with such a long wheelbase, the X-Class does stay very flat. It rides bumps very quietly. The steering is light and there’s very little lost motion at the straight-ahead, but you can’t help thinking the capability of the rest of the chassis (it grips quite well and resists leaning) would benefit from faster steering around the centre.
Driving my first 1000 miles in the X-Class has been an entirely pleasant experience, and easier than I expected, what with the decent driving characteristics, a 530-mile touring range, fuel consumption running around 36-38mpg and a quiet mechanical package.
Join the debate
scrap
If you live on a farm, one of
If you live on a farm, one of these would be perfect. For the rest of us... have a word with yourself.
jason_recliner
Should have got a Hilux
Cheltenhamshire
Independent?
concinnity
Misunderstanding multilink.
I came here to post the same thing. Better than leaf springs only, but still a live axle with all the unspung weight that entails, (but also zero camber change under load).
typos1
concinnity wrote:
Yeah and Steve Cropley makes out the rear suspension ois Meredes only when its EXACTLY the same as the Nissan. Lets face this is a Navarra with some styling tweeks and Merc 6 cylinder diesels.
XXXX just went POP.
tuga
Question
Is it worth the extra money, or is it just a Navara with a 3 pointed star on the grille?
Bob Cat Brian
Interesting how ' the
Interesting how ' the wheelbase is only 233mm (less than a foot) longer than a Land Rover Discovery' and 'The Big X is only a few inches longer than the current crop of long-wheelbase luxury saloons' yet the same journalists will make a huge deal the extra space provided by one model being 40mm longer than another in the same class etc.
One thing I can never understand with pickups is the claim of practicality. Anything in the bed is open to the elements and theives, unless you stick a box on the back, at which point you may as well as have bought a van.
ianp55
Mercedes Benz X-Class
So Mercedes Benz decided to produce a pick-up,really??????????? what they've really done is add a few fancy touches and a three pointed star on a Nissan Navara and call it the X-Class. To add insult to injury it's not even built by Mercedes but at the Nissan factory along side the equally badge engineered Renualt Alaskan, this is no more a premium product than the Renualt Kangoo based Mercedes Citan, this is nothing special just a cynical marketing trick by Mercedes and I wouldn't be surprised if it goes the same way as the Lincoln Blackwood which was a Ford F-150 with a luxury interior, a Lincoln grille and a fancy cargo area, this lasted just over a year before getting canned, I reckon the X-Class will go the same way
RCT V
ianp55 wrote:
Repeated for emphasis!
fhp111
Still A bit to go
Provided you can deal with the size, Pickups are fantastically versatile vehicles.
That said, I think there is still a bit of catching up to do, and a place for a more premium product than the X-Class which is still basically a Navara. I imagine its just becuase of cost, but air suspension really should be an option on some of these higher end trucks. I know on american trucks like the Dodge Ram its pretty standard and transforms the ride and gets rid of that pickup truck shudder and bounce.
Pages
Add your comment