Manchester City and the Decade That Changed the Premier League

Ten years on from the club’s sale to Abu Dhabi royalty, City is reimagining how to run a soccer club

Manchester City players celebrate as Vincent Kompany lifts the trophy following victory during the FA Community Shield between Manchester City and Chelsea on Aug. 5. Photo: Clive Mason/Getty Images

MANCHESTER, England—Vincent Kompany was still settling into life at Manchester City in the summer of 2008 when the rumors he’d been hearing finally came true.

“It took two or three weeks, then everything went crazy,” he said.

The craziness in question was a 24-hour-period when everything the then-22-year-old Kompany thought he knew about his new club changed forever. That’s when, the second-most famous club in Manchester was bought out of nowhere by a member of the royal family of Abu Dhabi. As if to shake things up even more, City proceeded immediately to break the British transfer record.

That sale, 10 years ago this weekend, is an epochal moment in the explosive growth of the Premier League. From one day to the next, Man City went from being a club on the verge of financial crisis to one of the richest in the sport.

Over the next decade, it would take on perhaps the most ambitious project ever attempted in English soccer: City became a dominant team on the pitch and one of the loudest voices among Premier League owners. More than a billion dollars of investment later, it sits atop a sporting empire that spans six teams on five continents.

“I didn’t think they were over-exaggerating, but I didn’t know how quickly it could happen,” said former City defender Joleon Lescott.

This wasn’t the first time a rich owner had kicked down the door of the Premier League. In 2003, Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich rescued a nearly broke Chelsea and spent enough of his own money to turn the club into a perennial contender. And before him, a steel magnate named Jack Walker had blown a fortune to lift Blackburn Rovers to a title—though his success was short-lived.

At first, it seemed that the group led by Abu Dhabi’s Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al Nahyan might be adopting the same tactic: throw enough money at a plaything team until it’s good. After the $50 million signing of Brazilian winger Robinho on deadline day 2008, every window brought another raft of expensive new transfers. Painfully aware that it was being overcharged by rival clubs, City plowed ahead, to the tune of $450 million for two dozen players in the new owners’ first five transfer periods.

Manchester City owner Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al Nahyan waves during a match in 2010. Photo: andrew yates/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

That investment came on top of the fortune City was already spending on upgrading its facilities. With players turning over so fast, it might as well have fitted revolving doors on the locker room.

“You definitely got to meet a lot of people,” Kompany said.

What might have looked like money-burning chaos was in fact a scramble to win as quickly as possible—not only for the sheer glory of it, but to lend legitimacy to the whole enterprise. Before City could be taken seriously as a business, it needed to be taken seriously as a soccer team.

Under then-manager Roberto Mancini, results became everything. Questions of playing style and attacking flair were secondary. “You couldn’t have told anyone that we were going for style when we hadn’t achieved anything,” Kompany said.

The first silverware arrived in the form of the 2011 FA Cup. Then, more dramatically, came the 2011-12 league title, secured with a goal on the last kick of the season.

“If you look at the grand plan and if you look at where we are today, this made sense,” City chief executive Ferran Soriano said. “It was a good idea to overinvest in that period.”

Manchester City fans celebrate after winning the English Premier League title in 2012. Photo: AP

Then City began the next phase. Except no one in Manchester was quite sure what it would look like. So just as it had in the early days of the Abu Dhabi era, City fell back on its original strategy: when in doubt, import.

This time, it was raiding Europe for more than players. City turned for inspiration to Barcelona, the most successful team on the continent at the time, and borrowed not just former executives but also the outlines of a bold new vision that reimagined the very definition of a soccer club.

First came Txiki Begiristain, a former forward who had played on Barcelona’s “Dream Team” of the early 1990s and then spent seven years as sporting director. He would join Brian Marwood at City to steer the club’s soccer philosophy.

Genera view inside Etihad Stadium in Manchester. Photo: carl recine/Reuters

Then City hired Soriano, a former Barça executive, to be its CEO. But the clubs in City’s midst—the likes of Manchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool—had a long head start in terms of commercial reach and savvy. City was never going to close the gap on United across town, for instance, which had used two decades of marketing genius to make itself the world’s richest club. City would need a different tack.

From his very first meeting with City’s owners, Soriano had pitched the idea of turning Manchester City into the first “multinational club.” When Soriano had first cooked up the plan more than six years earlier in Spain, it was an idea whose time hadn’t yet arrived. Now, the idea was back and City’s owners had the petrodollar-fueled ambition to make it happen.

Soriano was going to run a Premier League club by busting out of the Premier League. He wanted Manchester City affiliates in the U.S. and China first. The owners agreed. Fans were slightly more confused.

On Soriano’s first day on the job in 2012, he attended a City match at the Etihad Stadium in Manchester. On his second day, he boarded a flight to New York to open talks on buying Major League Soccer’s expansion team there.

The franchise would become New York City FC, the first of City Football Group’s five clubs outside of Manchester. The complexities of doing business in China meant that it opted to move into Australia with Melbourne City instead, along with teams in Japan, Spain and Uruguay over the past five years.

At home, meanwhile, City was plotting one more Catalan import. As early as 2012, the club approached Pep Guardiola to become its manager. Along with pretty much anything else in the soccer world, City could afford style too.

“It was always foreseen from the very beginning that we would try to bring Pep,” Soriano said.

Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola during a Premier League match at Wolverhampton. Photo: Nick Potts/Zuma Press

Only Guardiola said no. It took another three years to convince him to move to the Northwest of England. But the wait was worth it. In 2017-18, his second season, he assembled the most dominant team in Premier League history, one that posted 100 points and 106 goals in 38 games.

While Guardiola put his stamp on the pitch, City’s executives flexed their muscle in the boardroom. They set about challenging the very framework of the Premier League, not only through City’s international network of clubs, but on crucial points of revenue distribution and competitive balance in English soccer. For the rest of the league, looking on with a mixture of awe and fear, nothing City did went unnoticed anymore.

“You have to try something new,” Soriano said, “and hope that people are going to think, ‘This is crazy and I’m not going to follow you.’”

Write to Joshua Robinson at joshua.robinson@wsj.com