HC displeased that privilege proceedings against CS not over even after 4hrs of questioning

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

The Delhi today expressed displeasure with a Delhi Legislative Assembly committee, comprising legislators, for not completing its breach of privilege proceedings against despite questioning him for over four hours.

After senior Sudhir Nandrajog, appearing for the committee, said the officer's presence was not required for now, the made it clear "no further hearing shall be scheduled" by the panel till September 18, the next date of hearing.

The court also noted that in view of the statement made by the senior lawyer, the apprehensions of the bureaucrat "does not survive".

Prakash, represented by senior and Vivek Chib, has said in his plea that despite repeated requests, the verbatim and video recordings of the proceedings have not been provided to him.

He has claimed that without the records, he cannot defend himself against the charges of breach of privilege.

Nandrajog, appearing for the committee, said the verbatim records would be provided to the as soon as it is authorised by the Speaker, who is in and is expected to return on September 16.

He assured that the video records of the proceedings would be filed in court before the next date of hearing on September 18.

The court, thereafter, directed that the video records of the proceedings before the committee on July 27 and August 20 this year be placed before the next date of hearing.

In the application filed through advocates and Asif Ahmed, urged the court to put on hold the proceedings before the committee till it provided him with the records. He claimed that the committee had assured in the court that it would provide him with verbatim and video records of the proceedings.

The on July 24 had told that he was "adequately protected" against any punishment by the Assembly committee. It court had said that its order of July 13 was "expressly clear" that he would have to participate in the proceedings before the (CoP) and if any punishment was imposed on him, it would not be implemented till his plea against the panel's notice to him was decided.

The CoP had issued him a notice on a complaint by the Question and Reference (Q&R) Committee of the Assembly.

The had on March 9 asked the panels not to take coercive steps against the IAS officers.

The was earlier served a notice by the for skipping a meeting on February 20, which was scheduled a day after he was allegedly assaulted by two MLAs -- and

The had issued the notice after receiving a complaint against the by the This panel had also served notice on two IAS officers -- J B Singh, of Cooperative Societies, and Shurbir Singh, chief executive of the Improvement Board.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Tue, August 28 2018. 18:35 IST