AFT rules promotion denied to Maj Gen in 1997, orders promotion to rank of Lt Gen

Press Trust of India  |  Chandigarh 

The of the

today directed the to promote a senior officer, MMR Narang, to the rank of with all consequential benefits.

was approved for the next rank of Lt Gen but was made to retire in January 1997 as on the pretext that there was no vacancy available in the rank of Lt Gen, it had been contended in the petition.

The officer, belonging to the Corps of Engineers, had then filed a petition in the and Haryana in 1997, later transferred to AFT.

He had claimed that there were three vacancies for the out of which one vacancy of General (DGBR) was available and further there were other vacancies also available, including the post of (DGNCC).

He had stated that the appointment of DGNCC was kept vacant for five months and ultimately given to another of a junior batch, Lt Gen BS Malik, who was granted extension inservice for three months and then promoted and appointed as DGNCC.

He also stated that another officer, Maj Gen RJ Mordecai, who was declared fit to hold "staff" appointment was not appointed as DGNCC but was appointed as DGBR, a 'Corps' appointment, to keep DGNCC vacant.

He had also stated that the prevalent system of 'chain appointments' was not carried out due to political considerations.

Agreeing with the petition, the AFT comprising Justice Chauhan and Lt Gen Munish Sibal, in a strongly worded order today, held that the respondents have not only been unfair to the petitioner but also with the Court by concealing facts which amounted to playing "fraud on the court as well as opposite party".

It has been noted by the that the had filed a false affidavit in the saying that there were only two vacancies for the while in reality there were three.

The has observed that even prior to the promotion of Lt Gen BS Malik, for reasons best known to the respondents, post of DGNCC had been 'earmarked'.

It has also been observed that the had submitted before the Delhi in another case that there were actually 56 vacancies of Lt Gen including 4 acting vacancies which had been hidden from the AFT in this case where only 52 vacancies had been spelt out, the tribunal said.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Fri, August 24 2018. 00:10 IST