.svg)
Range Rover P400e Gets A Big Price Tag In U.S.
Land Rover introduces its first two plug-in hybrids in the U.S. – the 2019 Range Rover P400e and 2019 Range Rover Sport P400e.
Both models are equipped with the same powertrains (398hp of system output and 13.1 kWh battery). We expect that all-electric range will be around 20 miles.
The bigger Range Rover P400e starts at $95,150, while the smaller Range Rover Sport P400e at $78,300, but you need to add $995 destination fee so it’s $96,145 and $79,295 respectively. The available federal tax credit should effectively lower the cost by around $6,000.
See Also
The Range Rover P400e does 0-60 mph in 6.4 seconds, while the Range Rover Sport is able to achieve 6.3 seconds.
Range Rover P400e specs:
- 0-60mph in 6.4 seconds (0-100km/h in 6.8 seconds)
- up to 31 miles (51 km) of all-electric range (NEDC, think ~20 miles/32 real world/EPA)
- 13.1 kWh battery
- 296hp (217kW) 2.0-litre four-cylinder Ingenium petrol engine with a 85kW electric motor. Combined system output: 398hp (292kW), 640 Nm of torque
- permanent four-wheel drive system
- top speed of 137mph (220km/h)
- charging takes 2 hours 45 minutes at home using a dedicated 32 amp wall box (7 kW)
- battery is covered by an eight-year, 100,000-mile, 70% state of health warranty
Land Rover Range Rover P400e
Categories: Jaguar
Popular
Leave a Reply
17 Comments on "Range Rover P400e Gets A Big Price Tag In U.S."
of no consequence
Lets see.. $78k or $95k starting price for a 13 kWh battery?? I’m starting to think that there’s 2 types of electric crowds: 1) folks who put electric first and vehicle 2nd, and 2) the opposite. The Range Rover P400E is geared for the electric ‘dabblers,’ just like the i8, and any PHEV that gets less about 30 miles of electric range. Good Lord, it’s 2018- BEV’s get 250+ miles without breaking an electron sweat!
Two types of car crowds. 1) the first adopters where electric matters most. 2) Everyone else that just wants a car that does the job they want at the best price possible.
The non Hybrid Range Rover also starts at $85k, so in fact you’re paying $10k for a 13kWh battery, which isn’t particularly different to many other manufacturers offerings.
Sorry Andy from England, uncompetitive compliance-level as far as electric goes.
They might sell a few since their it is a large SUV and so far that market is untouched with the up to 7 seater Model X being smaller then this, but it is only a matter of time until Tesla or someone else enters this segment with a true electric large SUV.
There’s also the Volvo XC90 and Mercedes GLE PHEVs, which are pretty damn big.
Yes, but that would be a Tesla, not a Range Rover and will not have the cachet of Range Rover (important for many that buy Range Rovers). I agree though, it’s only a matter of time, but large proper off road SUV’s will be one of the last to transition to full BEV (and Range Rovers ARE proper off road vehicles, just with a bit of luxury).
Could Land Rover try harder, sure. We know they have the technology as seen in the I Pace, but there’s presumably a business case that is currently stopping them from putting it in Land Rovers. Perhaps they think the buyers of Land Rovers and Range Rovers aren’t quite as comfortable with the idea of a BEV as people that buy Jaguars? An assumption sure, but I’d suggest Range Rover buyers are quite a conservative bunch.
Ideology is great, but they need to make money at the same time.
I should’ve added the comparison price- a 75 kWh battery in the Model X that starts at $85k. Little bit better ROI with the Model X..
I doubt many buy a Range Rover for it’s ROI! 😀
It seems I’m wrong here. The Range Rover Sport is the slowest depreciating car in the UK this year. https://www.whatcar.com/news/slowest-depreciating-cars/
And in the US it depreciates by around 37% over three years according to Edmunds, The Tesla Model X depreciates by 36% over that time, the Model S by 35% and a basic Corolla depreciates by 31%. All depreciate by about 50% over 5 years.
https://www.edmunds.com/tesla/model-s/2017/st-401702530/cost-to-own/
https://www.edmunds.com/tesla/model-x/2018/st-401748305/cost-to-own/
https://www.edmunds.com/landrover/range-rover/2018/st-401745869/cost-to-own/
https://www.edmunds.com/ford/f-150/2017/st-401665786/cost-to-own/
That previous comment should have been in reply to my comment about depreciation not ROI…! (Currently in moderation due to links)
This car is for carpool lane access, not for those who wish to drive electric. I’ll be really surprised if any actually plug in.
Yea, at least the i8 has the excuse that it was essentially done and being shown off at car shows in 2013, with sales starting in 2014, so it gets a bit of a pass for being fairly early to market for a performance plugin. But it is getting a bit late now not to do better.
May god help you sell this vehicle
I am sure they will sell in California just for the car pool stickers. Especially since the current stickers all expire in December.
I think depreciation on Range Rovers is eye watering anyway, so I doubt people will care too much!
Is Range Rover a luxury brand? They look like a Kia from the outside.
Lame AER / Compliance car.
CA should start disallowing PHEV’s the HOV.Carpool stickers.