Sabarimala women entry row: Deity’s celibacy not basis for entry ban, says Kerala government

On a day when the Supreme Court reserved its verdict on a batch of pleas challenging the ban on entry of women in the age group of 10-50 into the Sabarimala temple in Kerala, the state

Published: 02nd August 2018 03:43 AM  |   Last Updated: 02nd August 2018 03:44 AM   |  A+A-

Sabarimala temple

Sabarimala temple ( File Photo)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: On a day when the Supreme Court reserved its verdict on a batch of pleas challenging the ban on entry of women in the age group of 10-50 into the Sabarimala temple in Kerala, the state government on Wednesday told the court that celibate status of deity cannot be a ground to bar women’s entry into the hill shrine.

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra asked the counsels of both sides to compile the submissions and submit before them within seven days.

As per norms prescribed by the temple board, women aged between 10 and 50 are prohibited from visiting the premises. In January 2016, the court had questioned the ban, saying this cannot be done under the Constitution.

READ | Time to end priestly celibacy

In the concluding arguments, Kerala government favouring the entry of women in the temple said, “Ayappa temple cannot claim to be a district denomination to claim a custom which bars entry of women. “Banning women is constitutionally not permissible.”

During the hearing, CJI Mishra also observed, “The deity has right to privacy in certain aspect like temple rites, though not in the sense expounded by Puttaswamy judgement (right to privacy).”

Senior advocate Indira Jaising in her final arguments said that, “Court need to strike down every custom and statute that prevent women from entering the temple. Untouchability was a practice and it can’t be confined to traditional meaning. “

ALSO READ | What’s so sacred about celibacy?

Amicus Currie senior advocate K Ramamoorthy supported the age-old customary practice rooted in ardent religious beliefs associated with the Temple and told the bench, “Ayyappa temple follows religious practice and can’t be tested.” 

He further added that impugned practice came in the teeth of Article 14, the obligation under the provision being on the State within the ambit of which the religious institution did not fall.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.