Frivolous complainant told to pay penalty to consumer welfare fund in Hyderabad

The complainant alleging that a government body had failed to do public duty by not responding to a letter.

Published: 09th July 2018 05:19 AM  |   Last Updated: 09th July 2018 05:19 AM   |  A+A-

Express News Service

HYDERABAD: Arguably for the first time, a frivolous complaint has not only drawn the ire of a district consumer forum but has also led to a direction to the complaint to deposit an amount of Rs 5,000 with the Consumer Welfare Fund (CWF) and pay another Rs 5,000 to the respondent.  The CWF is used to spread awareness among people on consumer rights.

The complainant alleging that a government body had failed to do public duty by not responding to a letter. But the forum held that the consumer filed the case in a “confused state of mind” and wasted the “valuable time” of the court.

According to the forum order, B Raju (name changed), the complainant, had written to an executive engineer of the Andhra Pradesh Housing Board (APHB)  to book a flat at Bhavanipuram in Vijayawada for him under the self-financing scheme. He drew a demand draft for Rs 74,270 towards the booking amount.  
But Raju could not get a slot in the booking as the booking was closed and the DD he sent to APHB was sent back to him.

He then wrote a letter to APHB that there was a 10 per cent quota for government employees under which he should be allotted the flat. But his letter elicited no reply from APHB, prompting him to file a complaint. Meanwhile, the APHB clarified that the booking of flats was based on a ‘first come, first served’ basis and it was impossible to make an allocation after bookings were closed.
Furious at the “frivolous” complaint, the forum directed Raju to pay `10,000- half of it to APHB for causing mental agony to them and half to the CWF.

C Narasimha Rao, forum president who pronounced the order, said that the complaint was a “frivolous case from the beginning. Usually, cases like these are not admitted and, in most cases, frivolous complaints are dismissed asking the complainant to approach a different court to keep up the spirit of consumer rights. But, this one was extreme. It took me an entire week to understand the basic facts of the case.”   
It may be mentioned here that such norm is commonly practised by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) to raise the national consumer welfare fund.

Stay up to date on all the latest Hyderabad news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.