Trump hails Supreme Court's support for travel ban

IANS  |  Washington 

US on Tuesday hailed the ruling that on several Muslim-majority countries is lawful and termed it "a tremendous victory" and "moment of profound vindication".

"The [order] is expressly premised on legitimate purposes: preventing entry of nationals who cannot be adequately vetted and inducing other nations to improve their practices," wrote in the majority opinion.

"The text says nothing about religion." Roberts wrote, rejecting claims that the ban was motivated by religious hostility.

"Today's ruling is a tremendous victory for the American People and the Constitution," said in a statement.

"The has upheld the clear authority of the to defend the national security of the US. In this era of worldwide terrorism and extremist movements bent on harming innocent civilians, we must properly vet those coming into our country," he added.

said the ruling "is also a moment of profound vindication" for his government "following months of hysterical commentary from the media and Democratic politicians who refuse to do what it takes to secure our border and our country", reported.

"As long as I am President, I will defend the sovereignty, safety, and security of the American People, and fight for an immigration system that serves the national interests of the and its citizens. Our country will always be safe, secure, and protected on my watch," he said.

The case has been central to the immigration policy, presenting a key test of Trump's campaign promise to restrict immigration and secure the US borders, reported.

Trump has signed three versions of orders on immigration restrictions targeting several Muslim-majority countries. The initial order, signed soon after he took office in January last year, led to days of nationwide protests and chaos at airports across the country.

The third version of Trump's barred nearly all travelers from five mainly Muslim countries, namely Iran, Libya, Somalia, and It also adds a ban on travelers from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and government officials from

The lower courts had ruled that all three versions either violate or are unconstitutional.

--IANS

qd

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Wed, June 27 2018. 04:42 IST