Published on : Thursday, June 14, 2018
Tourists reached out to feel the heat from the still-smouldering lava, tossed sticks to see them burst into flames or watched a guide toast marshmallows on hot rocks as they hiked on Guatemala’s Pacaya volcano, which days earlier had spewed lava.
From the peak of Pacaya they had a clear view of the nearby Volcano of Fire, which erupted June 3, emitting a fast-moving avalanche of super-heated muck that killed at least 110 people and left about 200 missing.
Silvia Sazo, one of the few female tour guides at Pacaya, saw her own home destroyed by a 2010 eruption. Her family rebuilt in the same place, and there are still spots on the ground near her house where vapor and heat stream from the ground. “You can put eggs, corn and chayotes in the ground, and they cook,” she said. “We don’t have anywhere else to live…This is our way of life.”
The Pacaya volcano began having effusive eruptions in 2006 while the deadly blast of ash and rock from the Volcano of Fire was an explosive eruption.
Although locals don’t use the scientific terms, they know the difference: Explosive eruptions of ash, gas and rock can easily kill, while effusive eruptions – lava flows – can be interesting for tourists to look at. Some volcanos have both types, and Pacaya had an explosive blast in 2010 that killed a reporter and two locals.
But there is always danger with both types, including the emission of toxic gases, notes John Stix, a professor at the earth and planetary sciences department at McGill University in Canada.
“I think anyone who visits an active volcano needs to appreciate that there is some risk involved, and the risk increases as one gets closer to the active vent or crater,” Styx wrote.
Which, in far less scientific terms, is what locals say.
“We don’t worry about the lava, we worry about the crater” from which explosive eruptions come, said Sazo.
Residents who depend on Pacaya for their livelihood have learned to respect and read the volcano, like park maintenance worker Juan Francisco Alfaro, who lives in the nearby hamlet of Patrocinio.
“We are always alert. You don’t wait, you go if there is an explosive eruption,” Alfaro said.
Many carefully watch the colour of the plumes coming from the crater: White is OK, but black means danger.
Jose Quezada, who has guided tours for 18 years, estimates half the people in San Francisco de Sales earn a living from volcano tourism.
“Over time, we have learned to live with the volcano,” he said. “You don’t fool around with the volcano.”
Each day, Quezada gets reports from residents who have hiked up the mountain earlier in the day about where it is safe to take tour groups. Going to the summit and peering into the crater is no longer allowed.
Tourists come to Pacaya for the altitude, cool weather, stunning views and singular experience of seeing the force of nature.
The altitude – the volcanos are the only geographic features rising off the steamy plains – is one reason why many people live in villages like San Francisco de Sales. It is perfect for growing coffee, but after a plant disease wiped out coffee trees, people recently began planting avocados.
“Coffee is no longer profitable after we got coffee rust,” said farmer Roberto Mijango. “We’re only getting paid $18 for a 100-pound sack (46 kilograms) of coffee berries. The fertiliser costs more than that.”
But the three- and four-year-old avocado trees won’t bear enough fruit to support the farmers for another few years. So without the tourism income, the villages around Pacaya would be impoverished.
Tags: Volcano tourism