Pak SC notice to Musharraf on plea seeking recovery of losses due to controversial law

Press Trust of India  |  Islamabad 

Pakistan's has issued a notice to former military dictator on a petition seeking recovery of huge losses the country incurred after the promulgation of a in 2007 which gave amnesty to several politicians in all court cases.

The ordinance gave amnesty to Bhutto and other political leaders -- except then exiled former -- in all court cases against them.

Through the NRO which was later declared illegal by the court, several politicians and others were pardoned and their cases quashed.

The Express Tribune reported that the notice will be published in two newspapers circulated in the UAE where Musharraf, 74, has been residing for the last two years.

Nominating Musharraf, former and former as respondents, petitioner had requested the court to order recovery of "huge amounts of public money" misappropriated and wasted by them through unlawful means "already on record in different judgements of the and high court".

He had contended that Musharraf subverted the Constitution by declaring emergency followed by the promulgation of the NRO, through which criminal and corruption cases against politicians, including Zardari, were "arbitrarily withdrawn", causing huge financial losses to the national exchequer.

"Since the in its landmark judgement of December 16, 2009 has declared the NRO 'void ab initio', the respondents are liable to compensate the losses and the damage suffered by the exchequer of debt-ridden Pakistan, including the loss of USD 60 million stashed in Swiss banks allegedly by Zardari," the petitioner said.

He had said Malik Qayyum had written a letter to the Swiss to withdraw criminal and civil proceedings against Zardari in Geneva, but the Supreme Court in its 2009 judgement held that Qayyum had written the letter in his personal capacity, against the Rules of Business, 1973.

"The actions of Musharraf and Qayyum by promulgating the NRO caused huge losses amounting to billions of rupees to debt-ridden Both wilfully violated the oath of office to the detriment of the country in violation of the rule of the law," the petitioner alleged.

Yesterday, for Zardari requested the Supreme Court's three-judge bench headed by to give him some time for filing a reply as he had received notice of the case a day earlier.

The while submitting a reply stated that the apex court's December 16, 2009 judgement has already been complied with. The court later granted 10-day time to Naek for filing the reply.

Qayyum has already submitted the reply, in which he has defended the letter to Swiss authorities for withdrawing of Pakistan's plea to become party in the case against Zardari.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Wed, June 06 2018. 13:15 IST