An American Airlines jet flew into a massive thunderstorm complex in eastern New Mexico on Sunday night, where it was bombarded by hail and besieged by strong winds, lightning and torrential rain. The hail cracked the windshields and decimated the nose of the Airbus 319 aircraft.
In the wake of the incident, meteorologists have expressed disbelief that the aircraft flew into such a violent storm.
Flight 1897, originating from San Antonio and en route to Phoenix, diverted to El Paso after the harrowing encounter, where it landed safely.
In daylight: This is what damaged @AmericanAir Flight 1897 that landed in #ElPaso looks like. Holly Rush took this image. More on #AA1897: https://t.co/15EOCugFn9 pic.twitter.com/19XcOS91gk
— KFOX14 News (@KFOX14) June 4, 2018
No injuries were reported, but eyewitnesses reported multiple sick passengers because of severe turbulence.
“I’m on this flight that emergency landed,” tweeted passenger Ezra after the trauma. “Things were flying. Passengers throwing up.”
A passenger told ABC15 out of Phoenix that cellphones were “flying in the air, drinks splashing on the ceiling, and people sharing airsick bags.”
Another passenger, Jesus Esparza, said the plane dropped “like a rollercoaster,” according to the Associated Press.
The flight carried 130 passengers and five crew.
The El Paso Times obtained this apologetic statement from American Airlines after the incident:
American Airlines flight 1897, from San Antonio to Phoenix, diverted to El Paso due to damage sustained by weather in flight. We commend the great work of our pilots, along with our flight attendants, who safely landed the Airbus A319 at 8:03 p.m. The aircraft is currently being evaluated by our maintenance team. We never want to disrupt our customers’ travel plans, and we are sorry for the trouble this caused.
Meteorologist Stu Ostro of the Weather Channel tweeted radar imagery suggesting that the plane flew right into the core of the towering thunderstorm over eastern New Mexico:
Plot of locations (from log at https://t.co/Fl9aKcLmem) of #AA1897 flight, which encountered hail and severe turbulence https://t.co/OAHI5qSmD6 last night, on radar imagery and a 3-D view of the hail core pic.twitter.com/3E3Dg9Z8Wv
— Stu Ostro (@StuOstro) June 4, 2018
On Twitter, meteorologists seemed incredulous that the flight took such a perilous path.
“Wow, that’s really crazy,” tweeted Ken Waters, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service. “It would have been so easy to divert around.”
“OK, WHY were they flying in a thunderstorm?,” tweeted Rick Smith, the warning coordination meteorologist for the Weather Service office in Norman, Okla.
Radar indicated that the hailstones were about 1.5 inches across, bigger than golf balls. Jeff Piotrowski, a meteorologist and storm chaser, tweeted that visible damage indicated they may have been 2 to 3 inches in diameter, approaching baseball-size.
#NEW: Here is what @AmericanAir pilots had to contend with after their @Airbus A319, originally flying from San Antonio to Phoenix, was diverted El Paso due to damage sustained by weather in flight. Photos courtesy Holly Rush. #NBCDFWNow pic.twitter.com/oMo9tlgcGu
— Don Peritz Jr. (@DonPeritzNBC5) June 4, 2018
The thunderstorm was part of a massive complex that drifted east and collided with multiple other complexes over central Texas.
Crazy collision/merger of MCSs (thunderstorm systems) moving to the east & west #WeatherNeverCeasesToBeFascinating pic.twitter.com/xrDYudzURq
— Stu Ostro (@StuOstro) June 4, 2018
Mike Smith, a recently retired vice president at AccuWeather, suggested in a blog post that, even though the aircraft landed safely, the airline and pilots may be guilty of “aeronautical malpractice” by venturing into the storm.
“The plane left San Antonio a few minutes early which would have allowed it considerable time to avoid the thunderstorms and still get to Phoenix more or less on time,” he wrote.
Smith added that pilots should have been able to see the billowing storm clouds at least 5 to 8 minutes before they flew into the storm.
But Matthias Steiner, director of the aviation applications program at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, said information available to the pilots may have been very limited and they are “handicapped in some ways.” He explained that due to cybersecurity and other complex issues, the weather information in the cockpit is in some cases less sophisticated than data a passenger can obtain on the Internet inside the cabin.
“The radar data is different than you get from Weather Channel or the Weather Service,” he said. “What you have in the cockpit has a much shorter wavelength, the signal saturates and attenuates much more quickly. [Pilots] don’t get the full picture, just the front-end.”
Steiner said pilots fly through gaps in storms “all the time every day” but that these gaps can close very quickly when storms can erupt in minutes. Whether the pilots erred “depends on what information they had in the cockpit,” he said.
The pilots may have been swayed to try to shoot the gap between storms because earlier flights made it through, he added. In these situations, Steiner said dialog is required between the pilots and both air traffic controllers and dispatch and that, in this case, it’s possible there was a communications breakdown.
Steiner did say the problem of access to the best available weather data in the cockpit is “improving.”
Smith concluded: “[I]t is well past time for America’s commercial airlines to update and reinforce thunderstorm avoidance training for their flight crews.”
Read more