Trump pardoning himself would be 'almost self-executing impeachment': Preet Bharara

Press Trust of India  |  Washington 

It "would be outrageous" for a sitting US to himself, former has asserted after Donald Trump's said probably the has the power to himself in the collusion affair.

The question of self-arose after Times published a 20-page letter to the from Trump's lawyers.

In the letter, they say the has absolute power as US to end investigations, or "even exercise his power to pardon".

Asked about the letter of Trump's and then-Trump John Dowd, Trump's said yesterday that the President is not going to pardon himself but "probably does" have the power to do it.

"He has no intention of pardoning himself," Giuliani told ABC's "" He added, "It would be an open question. I think it would probably get answered by gosh, that's what the Constitution says, and if you want to change it, change it. But yes."

Reacting to the letter as well as Giuliani's explanation, Bharara, the Indian-origin attorney, who was fired by President Trump last year, said that it "would be outrageous" for a sitting president to pardon himself.

"I think (if) the President decided he was going to pardon himself, I think that's almost self-executing impeachment," Bharara, a legal analyst, said on CNN's "State of the Union."

"Whether or not there is a minor legal argument that some somewhere in a legal journal can make that the President can pardon, that's not what the framers could have intended. That's not what the American people, I think, would be able to stand for," he said.

Bharara, who served as the Attorney for the Southern District of from 2009 to 2017, said that he doesn't believe Giuliani's assertion that the President is not considering granting himself a pardon.

"Rudy, just like Jay Sekulow, keeps coming up with things that end up being false. When he says the President is not contemplating something, I have no faith in that whatsoever," he said.

The case stems from the investigation by Mueller into alleged collusion between the Trump team and Russian officials in the 2016 election campaign that brought the Republican billionaire to power.

Trump has always maintained there was no collusion and that the investigation is a "witch hunt".

Part of Mueller's investigation is looking at whether Trump sought to criminally obstruct it, especially with the sacking of ex-and former FBI James Comey, and with his reaction to Jeff Sessions' recusal from the investigation.

In the letter to Mueller, which was sent in January, Sekulow and Dowd has acknowledged for the first time that Trump "dictated" a statement put out about his son's controversial 2016 meeting with Russians at Trump Tower, reported.

It also says that the letter contradicts several public statements by Sekulow and also by Sarah Sanders, who said Trump "certainly didn't dictate," but rather "weighed in, offered suggestion like any father would do."

said he does not think a president should pardon himself or herself.

"I don't believe that would be a legal question," McCarthy, a from California, said.

"The President is not saying he is going to pardon himself. I don't know why we're walking through hypotheticals here in this process. The President has never said he pardoned himself. I don't know where the President would go forward pardoning himself. But I don't think a president should pardon themselves," McCarthy added.

Mueller has so far indicted 19 people as part of his probe, including four members of the Trump campaign team or administration.

A total of 13 Russians have also been charged over their links to the Internet Research Agency, a Russian "troll factory" accused of spreading fake stories through US

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Mon, June 04 2018. 15:40 IST