Mallya resigns as Force India F1 director, seeks appeal in assets case

Press Trust of India  |  London 

Embattled liquor tycoon has resigned as of his motorsport company Force as his legal team filed an application to seek an appeal against a 1.145-billion-pound UK high court ruling on freezing of his assets.

boss Subrata Roy remains a of the company headquartered at Silverstone in the East Midlands region of England.

The team will not be making any further comment, said a for

was quoted in some of racing publications as saying that his son, Siddharth Mallya, would be taking on the position of in his place, while he continues in his role as 'team principal'.

"There was no compulsion anywhere to resign. It's just that I decided my son should replace me," he told Autosport'.

"I have my own legal issues to take care of, so it's better that the company remains unaffected," he added.

The legal issues involve his trial, the next hearing for which is scheduled for July 11 at in London.

Meanwhile, UK firm TLT, which had won a landmark case last month on behalf of 13 Indian banks seeking recovery of their dues from the businessman, confirmed that Mallya's legal team has filed an application to seek permission to appeal against the high court order in the court of appeal earlier this week.

In the high court ruling on May 8, had refused to overturn a worldwide order freezing Mallya's assets and upheld an Indian court's ruling that the consortium of 13 Indian banks State of India, of Baroda, Corporation bank, Federal Ltd, IDBI Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, Jammu & Kashmir Bank, & Sind Bank, National Bank, State Bank of Mysore, UCO Bank, United Bank of India, and were entitled to recover funds amounting to nearly 1.145 billion pounds.

The banks are considering all of their options, a said.

The victory for the banks enables them to enforce India's Debt Recovery Tribunal's (DRT) ruling against Mallya's assets in England and The worldwide freezing order prevents him from removing any assets from England and up to that value or to in any way dispose of, deal with or diminish the value of his assets in or outside of this jurisdiction, up to the same value.

The case marked the first recorded case of a judgment of the DRT in India being registered by the UK high court, setting a legal precedent.

In all these circumstances, and even taking account of the fact that Dr is contesting the alleged grounds for extradition, there are grounds for regarding Dr Mallya as a fugitive from justice, Henshaw had said as part of his ruling.

He had also refused permission to appeal, leaving Mallya's legal team with the last resort of turning to the of appeal. A decision on whether his appeal against the high court order will be accepted is expected within four to six weeks.

Meanwhile, the former boss remains on bail since his arrest on an warrant in April last year. He will return for his extradition hearing next month, after which the court is expected to set a timeline for a judgment in that case. The (CPS), representing the Indian government, says it has successfully established a prima facie case of fraud against the industrialist.

Mallya's lawyers have claimed the criminal charges against him are without substance and politically motivated. They have also challenged the case on human rights grounds, questioning the conditions at in Mumbai, where the is to be held post-extradition.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Fri, June 01 2018. 19:30 IST