Syria has taken the rotating presidency of the United Nations (U.N.)’s Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, prompting disruptive objection by the United States.
The chairing of the Conference on Disarmament (CD) rotates alphabetically among the body’s 65 members every four weeks, and Syria’s turn came on Monday.
Syrian Ambassador Hussam Edin Aala opened the conference’s latest round on Tuesday.
The U.S., opposed to the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, objected to Syria’s takeover of the committee’s presidency.
“Syria’s presence here is a travesty… and it is just unacceptable for them to be leading this body,” U.S. Ambassador Robert Wood said just before the session began on Tuesday.
The U.S. delegation — led by Wood — then briefly left the room in protest and returned shortly afterwards.
Back on the floor, Wood voiced Washington’s displeasure.
“Let me be clear: we cannot permit ‘business as usual’ in the CD while Syria presides over this body,” Wood said, referring to potential plans to disrupt upcoming meetings. “During the next four weeks, we will be present in this hall to ensure that Syria is not able to advance initiatives that run counter to the interests of the United States, but we will fundamentally alter the nature of our presence in the plenaries.”
After making that statement, the U.S. ambassador moved to a seat usually reserved for assistants, apparently in protest.
Ahead of the session, Wood had stressed that his country did not plan to boycott the CD during the four weeks of Syrian presidency.
A number of ambassadors from other countries, including Britain, Australia, and France, echoed Wood’s remarks.
He claimed that the U.S. sought to hold Syria to account for its alleged use of chemical weapons.
The Syrian government surrendered its stockpiles of chemical weapons in 2014 to a joint mission led by the U.N. and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), which oversaw the removal and destruction of the weaponry.
Western governments and their allies, however, have continued to accuse Damascus of having conducted chemical attacks on a number of occasions during the conflict in Syria.
The Syrian government has rejected all allegations of chemical attacks and has pointed to the conclusion of the U.N.-OPCW mission to make the case that it is no more in possession of chemical armaments.
This article has been adapted from its original source.
Add a new comment