CBC Investigates

Regina canola trader appeals judges ruling that declared company's contracts 'unconscionable'

Regina-based Input Capital is asking the Court of Appeal to overturn a verdict issued earlier this month that said the company’s contracts with a Macoun-area farmer are “unconscionable” and “must be set aside.”

Input Capital says judge erred in setting aside its agreements

Geoff Leo · CBC News ·
Input Capital is a Regina-based company that offers canola streaming contracts which it says are a "low cost source of capital for farmers." (www.inputcapital.com)

Regina-based Input Capital is asking the Court of Appeal to overturn a verdict issued earlier this month that said the company's contracts with a Macoun-area farmer are "unconscionable" and "must be set aside."

In 2014 and 2015, Terry Gustafson entered into a series of agreements with Input, which bills itself as a "low cost source of capital for farmers." It paid him cash up front for a portion of his future canola crop.

The learned judge erred in fact and law in holding that the cumulative effect of the agreements is substantially unfair.- Input Capital's Notice of Appeal

Justice Jeff Kalmakoff found that the contracts were "heavily one-sided" where the risk was almost entirely borne by the farmer while Input took very little risk. He concluded that, because of that fundamental unfairness, "the entire contractual relationship between Mr. Gustafson and ICC is substantially unfair and cannot be permitted to stand.

In its appeal, filed Monday, Input said in arriving at his conclusion, the judge made a series of errors which led him to a faulty conclusion.

Kalmakoff used a three part test to determine the contracts should be set aside.

Input argued that he made mistakes "in fact and in law" on each point.

"The learned judge erred in fact and law in holding that the cumulative effect of the agreements is substantially unfair," says the Notice of Appeal.A group of Saskatchewan farmers launched a class action lawsuit against Input Capital earlier this month, claiming the company engaged in 'predatory lending' (Shutterstock)

Input facing class action lawsuit

This case is being watched with great interest by a group of farmers who launched a class action against Input earlier this month, alleging the company has engaged in "predatory lending." The class members are calling on the court to declare Input's contracts illegal.

Their lawyer, Tony Merchant, said the ruling in the Gustafson case "may mean the end of Input."

In a text message to CBC, he said the ruling "means every farmer in the clutches of Input can get free and most can get back a lot of money."

Kalmakoff's ruling wasn't entirely in Gustafson's favour. It found Input had given him $4.4 million in upfront payments while failing to deliver canola in repayment.

The judge said Gustafson has to pay that money back.

Input is asking the Court of Appeal to allow the company to seize money from one of Gustafson's bank accounts.

About the Author

Geoff Leo

Senior Investigative Journalist

Geoff Leo has been a reporter for CBC News in Saskatchewan since 2001. His work as an investigative journalist and documentary producer has earned numerous national and regional awards.