Fund embezzlement case: Teesta, her husband's anticipatory

Press Trust of India  |  Ahmedabad 

The city sessions court today rejected the plea of social activists Teesta

Setalvad and her husband in Rs 1.4 crore alleged fund embezzlement case related to their

"The court rejected the plea of Setalvad and Anand," told

Opposing the bail plea, the crime branch had earlier claimed that the couple had misused the money granted to their by the between 2010 and 2013 for educational purposes, for their "personal and political cause".

In its submission, the crime branch had said that the accused misused the funds "to pay witnesses in serious cases in (2002 riot cases) to make false deposition".

During this period, Setalvad worked as for her NGO Citizen for Justice and Peace, while her husband as the of the

The ministry had granted Rs 1.4 crore between 2010 and 2013 to the NGO for a scheme under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, as per the submission made by the Police in the court opposing their plea.

Complainant Raees Khan Pathan, a former aide of Setalvad, had lodged an FIR against them and some unidentified officials of the under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

In its submission, the crime branch had stated that the investigation was at a sensitive stage and the accused were capable of affecting evidences against them if they were prevented from arrest.

Under the 'Khoj project', the Sabrang Trust published literature and pamphlets that spread communal hatred which were against the Constitution and judiciary, which is "dangerous for country's unity", it said.

Setalvad pitched for fund by misusing her position as a member of the of the HRD Ministry, police had said.

The had last month granted temporary relief to Setalvad and Anand by extending their interim protection from arrest and transit anticipatory bail from May 2 to May 31, granted to them by the

The apex court had said that the duo will not be arrested till May 31, but before that they would have to approach the competent court in the state which will decide the matter on merits.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Wed, May 23 2018. 22:35 IST