Sharad Yadav's plea against disqualification be heard by division bench: HC told

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

The plea of former JD(U) Sharad Yadav, challenging the order of the disqualifying him as an MP, should be heard by a division bench, the was told today.

Justice said Singh should file an independent application in this regard and listed the matter for May 23.

Singh, through senior Dinesh Dwivedi, has also sought modification of the court's December 15 last year's order allowing Yadav to enjoy the perks, salary, allowances and bungalow of an Yadav was disqualified from the House on December 4 last year.

Yadav had joined hands with the opposition after the JD(U) and chief minister, Nitish Kumar, dumped the alliance with the and the in and tied up with the BJP in July last year.

Earlier, senior Sanjay Jain, representing the of Rajya Sabha, had also sought that the matter be heard by a division bench.

Senior Kapil Sibal, appearing for Yadav, had opposed the plea.

The high court had earlier observed that Yadav may have to refund the salary drawn by him during the pendency of his petition challenging his disqualification as a member, if he was not successful in his plea.

The high court on December 15 last year, while refusing to grant an interim stay on Yadav's disqualification, had allowed him to draw his salary, allowances, perks and retain the bungalow.

The same order was later passed by the court on a similar plea moved by Yadav's colleague and MP, Ali Anwar, both of whom were disqualified from the by the December 4, 2017, order of the

Yadav has challenged his disqualification on several grounds, including that he was not given any chance to present his views by the chairman before he passed the order.

On the other hand, had sought disqualification of Yadav and Anwar on the ground that they had attended a rally of opposition parties in in violation of party directives.

Yadav was elected to the Rajya Sabha last year and his term is scheduled to end in July 2022. Anwar's term was to expire this (rpt this) year. Both were disqualified under the Anti-Defection Act.

Yadav's plea, filed through advocate Nizam Pasha, said that the December 4, 2017 order had disqualified him in an "extremely casual and callous way".

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Thu, May 03 2018. 20:25 IST