‘Richard III’ Review: The Villain Wore a Crown

Has Richard III been treated unfairly by history and by Shakespeare, for whom he was a “carnal cur” and a “lump of foul deformity”? Andrew Roberts reviews “Richard III” by Chris Skidmore.

Richard III is Britain’s most notorious monarch, and even 533 years after his death at the Battle of Bosworth, it’s not hard to understand why. Self-styled “Ricardians” argue that he was a loyal brother, fine soldier and astute administrator. They add that there is no actual evidence that he murdered his nephews, the so-called Princes in the Tower, who had a better claim to the throne than he did.

Set against them is William Shakespeare, who depicted Richard as a “carnal cur” and an “lump of foul deformity” who, in his pursuit...