Naidu move shows non-application of mind: Yechury

Press Trust of India  |  Hyderabad 

CPI(M) today said M Venkaiah Naidu's decision to reject the Opposition's impeachment plea of of was done with a "certain degree of non-application of mind".

He said the presiding of either House, in which the impeachment motion has been moved, does not have the discretion to independently decide about the validity of the motion. The motion needs to be referred to a three-member committee, which normally should include a judge, a high court and a jurist.

Yechury, who was re-elected as the party's yesterday, said if that committee gives the findings, saying the impeachment motion is untenable, then the could have taken the decision.

"But, without doing that, taking that decision (rejection of impeachment plea) smacks of a certain degree of non-application of mind and also been in a hurry. I am sure that the members will go to the to appeal because that is the right the members have," Yechury said.

"I can say this with a certain degree of experience, because... (of the impeachment notice) I moved against Justice of the Calcutta High Court," the 65-year-old Left leader said.

The had, in 2011, passed an impeachment motion against Justice Sen. But, before the motion could be placed in the Lok Sabha, Sen resigned.

The government, Yechury claimed, did not want to create a situation where the of was "deprived morally" of his authority to decide on the roster.

Earlier today, Naidu rejected the notice given by Opposition parties, led by the Congress, for impeachment of the CJI, citing "lack of substantial merit" in it.

On January 12, four senior-most judges of the -- Justices J Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B Lokur and -- had raised a litany of problems, including assigning of cases in the top court, and said there were certain issues afflicting the country's highest court.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Mon, April 23 2018. 18:55 IST