Fox chose Disney over Comcast on regulatory, stock fears - filing

Reuters 

By O'Donnell and Ankur Banerjee

The joint filing by and Fox, which outlines the timeline of their negotiations, offers the most detailed insight yet into Fox's thinking, as it goes head-to-head against Comcast, a U.S. cable operator, in its bid to acquire European pay-TV company , in which holds a 39 percent stake.

announced in February it was working on a $31 billion bid that would top Fox's deal for Sky. It has not made a new attempt to bid for the assets after the deal, so investors are keen for information on the hurdles that prevented an agreement between and

The filing does not mention by name, but refers to it as Party B. Another bidder for the assets, U.S. , is referred to as Party A.

Verizon and representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

on Nov. 14 offered to acquire most of Fox's assets in an all-stock deal valued at $34.41 per share, the filings said. ended up announcing an all-stock deal with for $29.54 per share.

Like Disney, sought to buy Fox's entertainment networks, studios, television production and international assets, the documents show.

In the filing, and said the ongoing antitrust scrutiny of U.S. provider Inc's planned merger with Inc heightened concerns about potential regulatory hurdles to Comcast's bid. The has sued and to thwart their deal, and the case is in court.

The companies added that, unlike Disney, declined to offer a reverse deal termination fee, which would compensate in the event that regulators stymied a deal. offered a reverse termination fee of $2.5 billion.

The companies also said that saw Disney's stock as more valuable than Comcast's, based on historic prices, and felt that a deal between and would generate greater long-term value. The controls through a dual-class stock structure.

Comcast's proposal, on the other hand, would reduce the compensation offered to shareholders in the event that asset sales were required to reassure antitrust regulators, increasing the potential risk to shareholders, the filing said.

Verizon's bid was rejected because it offered to acquire at market value, without a meaningful premium, according to the filing.

(Reporting by O'Donnell in New York and Ankur Banerjee in Bangalore; Editing by Richard Chang)

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Thu, April 19 2018. 05:20 IST