You are here: Home » Reuters » News
Business Standard

Trade fight mounts as Trump threatens $100 billion more in China tariffs

Reuters  |  WASHINGTON 

By and David Lawder

(Reuters) - said on Thursday he had instructed U.S. trade officials to consider $100 billion in additional tariffs against China, upping the ante in an already high-stakes trade confrontation between the world's two biggest economies.

The further tariffs were being considered "in light of China's unfair retaliation" against earlier U.S. trade actions, which included a proposed $50 billion of tariffs on Chinese goods, Trump said in a statement.

Financial markets, unsettled for days by the trade fight and Trump's management of it, whipsawed again on the new threat. After a bullish regular trading day, U.S. equity futures sold off sharply in after-market-hours trading.

futures traded down 1.3 percent, with similar moves in Dow and Nasdaq futures. In the currency markets, the U.S. dollar fell against the Japanese yen.

"The hastily crafted policy like we have seen from Trump over the last two, three days and now tonight ... is dangerous," said Doug Kass, who runs hedge fund "Our is going to make market volatility and economic uncertainty great again."

In his statement, Trump said the U.S. had determined that "has repeatedly engaged in practices to unfairly obtain America's intellectual property."

Earlier this week, the proposed 25 percent tariffs on 1,300 Chinese shot back with a list of similar proposed duties on American imports, including soybeans, planes, cars, beef and

"Rather than remedy its misconduct, has chosen to harm our farmers and manufacturers," the Republican said.

The tit-for-tat announcements have stirred fears that the two countries will spiral into a trade war that will crush global growth. Republican lawmakers from Western and Midwestern states have voiced worries about a big hit to U.S. farming exporters.

'THIS IS NUTS'

On the new threat, Republican Senator said in a statement: "Hopefully the is just blowing off steam again but, if he's even half-serious, this is nuts.

"is guilty of many things, but the has no actual plan to win right now. He's threatening to light American agriculture on fire. Let's absolutely take on Chinese bad behavior, but with a plan that punishes them instead of us. This is the dumbest possible way to do this," said the lawmaker from the farm-belt state of

officials have suggested throughout the week that talks with the Chinese could help resolve trade issues between the two countries. ran a $375 billion goods trade surplus with the in 2017. Trump has demanded that cut the trade gap by $100 billion.

A who requested anonymity told no formal negotiating sessions had yet been set, but that the was willing to negotiate with

The U.S. tariffs are aimed at forcing changes to policies designed to transfer U.S. intellectual property to Chinese companies.

The USTR's "Section 301" investigation authorizing the tariffs alleges has systematically sought to misappropriate U.S. intellectual property through joint venture requirements that often cannot be negotiated without technology transfers, something denies.

A did not immediately respond to a request for more information about which products would be targeted or the selection method and timing of the additional tariffs.

A further $100 billion in tariffs on Chinese goods would likely expand the scope of Trump's attack to more consumer goods. The first round of $50 billion in tariffs mostly targeted industrial goods and electronic components.

The biggest category of U.S. imports from last year was communications equipment, such as cellphones, and computer equipment. Both were spared from the initial tariffs list.

Dean Garfield, of the Industry Council, a tech industry lobbying group in Washington, said in a statement: "The announcement that the administration may issue $100 billion in additional tariffs on Chinese products is irresponsible and destabilizing.

"We need the U.S and to come to the table and identify solutions to these serious problems. We call on both sides to halt unproductive and escalatory rhetoric, recognizing that these words and actions have global consequences."

(Reporting by and David Lawder; Additional reporting by and in and Jennifer Ablan, Caroline Valetkevitch, Trevor Hunnicutt and Daniel Bases in New York; Writing by Chris Sanders; Editing by and Peter Cooney)

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Fri, April 06 2018. 08:55 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU