You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Blackbuck case: Animal right activists welcome Salman conviction

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Animal right groups today welcomed the sentencing of Bollywood star in a 1998 killing case, asserting the proved no one was above the law, while a section of activists said the should have been given the maximum punishment under the Wildlife Act.

Khan, sentenced to five years in jail by a today, was taken to the central jail in the city after the

"The shows, whether you are or an ordinary citizen, the facts will be heard by a court and the law will prevail," said.

(PETA), (PFA), and Humane Society were among the groups that welcomed the

was sentenced to five years in jail and fined Rs 10,000 for shooting down two blackbucks near Jodhpur on the night of October 1, 1998, while he and a group of other actors were in for the shooting of the film "Hum Saath Saath Hain".

"We are happy that justice has prevailed and a serial offender is behind bars. The judiciary has once again proved that the popularity of the accused has no bearing on the case before the court," Gauri Maulekhi said.

Khan, arguably Bollywood's most successful actor, had earlier been charged in other animal poaching cases.

(Antilope cervicapra) is an ungulate species of antelope native to the Indian subcontinent that has been classified in the (IUCN) list of threatened animals.

According to the IUCN, their range declined sharply in the 20th century because of unsustainable hunting.

"Being human is all about showing respect for the life of others, which has repeatedly and frivolously taken for granted," Maulekhi said.

was held guilty under Section 9/51 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act. Blackbucks are protected animals under Schedule I of the Act.

"It is highly unusual for a wildlife-related case to drag on like this. So, what other potential offenders can be sure of is that if they commit a crime against an animal, they will be booked. Salman, too, could have been given the maximum punishment under the Act," PETA India's Bangera said.

Baiju Raj M V, Conservation Projects, Wildlife SOS, described the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, as a very "progressive" law.

"If this conviction is established then it certainly makes it very clear that law and justice can be achieved for wildlife protection in our country. This conviction also show that everyone is equal and no one is above the law," he said.

A top forest official, who did not wish to be identified, said should have been given the maximum punishment of six years under the law.

"Being a Schedule I species, and this being a high-profile case, a strong message would have been sent if the maximum under the Wildlife Act was given," he said.

Gajender K Sharma, Country of World Animal Protection also hoped that the case will serve as a deterrent for those who violate the Act and exploit wildlife for personal gains.

"We would request the government to ensure strict enforcement of the Act and also create awareness about protecting wildlife. We also urge the government to strengthen the Act further by removing loopholes like the Section 40, which is being misused for the illegal trade of wild elephants," he said.

N G Jayasimha, the Managing of (India) said, "While we welcome this verdict, what should not be forgotten is that the rate of conviction in cases relate to this Act, is very low."

Welcoming the verdict, Varda Mehrotra, the of said, "The court has set a clear precedent that absolutely no one stands above the law, and that animals deserve rights. We highly appreciate (the verdict) and hope that this would serve as an example for those involved in poaching.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Fri, April 06 2018. 00:00 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU