You are here: Home » News-ANI » International » World
Business Standard

Pak minister trolled for giving communal colour to Salman's conviction

ANI  |  Islamabad [Pakistan] 

Twitterers were up in arms on Thursday after Foreign linked the sentencing of in the case with the actor's religion and said he has been sentenced "because he's a minority".

Salman was sentenced to five years in jail in the 1998 poaching case.

In an interview with of Pakistan's Geo TV, Asif said, "has been sentenced because he's a minority. To sentence him in a case that is twenty years old goes on to show that lives of those who are Muslims, 'untouchables' or Christians are not valued in "

"Maybe if he belonged to the religion of the ruling party of he would not have been given such a harsh sentence and the court might have been lenient with him," he claimed.

However, the comments made by Asif did not go down well among Twitterers and blasted the foreign in many humorous tweets.

A user asked that Saif Ali Khan, who has been acquitted in the case, has been let off, since he was a Hindu?

"And Saif Ali let off because he's Hindu?," the user wrote on

Another Twitterer cited the name of Sanjay Dutt, who was convicted in the 1993 blast case for possessing illegal weapons.

"What about ," the second user tweeted.

A third person lambasted the comments of Asif on Salman, saying that a country's defence should not give such statements.

"??, we can say but defence can't give such statement. I thought I am only fool here in tweeter. Thank you ?? sir," the user wrote on the

Continuing the tirade against Asif, a Twitterer questioned the ban of Salman's hit movies - 'Ek Tha Tiger' and its sequel 'Zinda Hai' by the government and slammed Asif's comments on the

"If you have so much concerns regarding him as he is minority, Why your country banned his movies, and Jinda hai? Hypocrisy?," wrote another user on

Another user castigated the foreign minister's comments and said that he should be looking at the country's problems, instead of terming Salman as a 'minority'.

"This old guy is mentally ill and senile. And he is a for a rogue state. First look at your country's problems then we can discuss about minorities," another wrote on the

Earlier on Thursday, a convicted Salman for five years in the 1998 poaching case. A penalty of Rs 10,000 has also been levied on him.

Other accused in the case - Tabu, Saif Ali Khan, Sonali Bendre, Neelam - were acquitted, while the 'Sultan' was held in the court.

In October 1998, total three cases in connection with poaching and one under the Arms Act were registered against Salman. The 52-year-old allegedly shot two blackbucks in Bhagoda ki Dhani in Kankani village near Jodhpur during the shooting of 'Hum Saath Saath Hain'.

Saif Ali Khan, Sonali Bendre, and Neelam were also present in the vehicle Salman allegedly used for hunting the endangered species protected under Schedule 1 of the Indian Wildlife Act.

Salman was charged under Section 51 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act and others under Section 51 read with Section 149 (unlawful assembly) of the Indian Penal Code.

On July 25, 2016, the High Court acquitted Salman of all charges in the poaching case and said there was no evidence to prove that the endangered animals were shot by the actor's licensed gun.

The on November 11, 2016, issued a notice to the Bollywood on an appeal by the government challenging his acquittal in poaching case. The apex court had agreed to fast-track the case.

In January 2017, Salman was acquitted by a in the Arms Act case.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Thu, April 05 2018. 21:05 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU