SC extends protection to Karti Chidambaram till April 2 in INX media money laundering case

Karti Chidambaram, former Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram’s son.   | Photo Credit: B. Jothi Ramalingam

Mr. Karti was on March 23 granted bail by the Delhi High Court in connection with the INX Media corruption case lodged by the CBI.

The Supreme Court on Monday extended the interim protection against arrest to Congress member and businessman Karti Chidambaram, granted by the Delhi High Court in the INX Media money laundering case, till April 2.

The order came as the Enforcement Directorate (ED) sought an authoritative pronouncement from the top court in view of several conflicting orders of different High Courts on the its power of arrest under section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

A Bench of Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud was told by Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta that the ED has been armed with the power of arrest under the statute, keeping in mind the several international conventions underlining the need to curb money laundering generated from drugs smuggling, terror financing and black money routing.

 

Referring to the 1988 United Nations convention, Mr. Mehta said the member countries felt the need to have law to deal with the offence of money laundering.

The advent of e-commerce had made investigation into money laundering more difficult as ill-gotten wealth were transferred to all corners of the world very conveniently after the globalisation, he said.

The interim order of March 15

The Bench said the interim order of March 15 granting protection of arrest to Mr. Karti, son of former Union Minister P. Chidambaram, till Monday, is extended till April 2. The hearing, which remained inconclusive, would also continue on April 2.

On March 15, while giving interim relief to Mr. Karti in the INX media money laundering case, the court said it would clear the “confusion” that had crept in due to the divergent views of different High Courts on the ED’s power to arrest.

The apex court had also transferred to itself the matters pending before the Delhi High Court relating to the power of ED to arrest in money laundering cases and also a plea filed by Mr. Karti seeking protection from arrest in the ED’s case.

The top court had said it would answer the question about interpretation of section 19 of the PMLA relating to the ED’s power to arrest and also deal with the issue whether High Courts can grant protection from arrest on a plea under Article 226 of the Constitution, which deals with High Court’s power to issue writs and orders.

Corruption case

Mr. Karti was on March 23 granted bail by the Delhi High Court in connection with the INX Media corruption case lodged by the CBI. He was arrested by the CBI on February 28 in Chennai immediately after he returned from abroad.

In his plea before the High Court, Mr. Karti has sought striking down of the ED’s power of arrest under section 19 of the PMLA, besides seeking the quashing of the enforcement case information report (ECIR) and the probe being carried out by the agency.

He has also sought striking down the presumption codified in section 24 of the PMLA, which says that when a person is accused of having committed an offence under section 3 (money laundering), the burden of proving that proceeds of the crime are untainted property, shall be on the accused.

An FIR filed by the CBI, filed on May 15 lastr, had alleged irregularities in the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) clearance to INX Media for receiving ₹305 crore in overseas funds in 2007 when Mr. P. Chidambaram was the Union Finance Minister.