Watchdog misled the High Court over its advice to pro-Brexit group

Stephen Parkinson 
Mr Sanni accused Stephen Parkinson and No 10 of publicly disclosing his sexuality and putting his family in danger. Credit: Andrew Parsons / i-Images

Britain's elections watchdog misled the High Court during an ongoing dispute over the legality of a donation made by the official pro-Brexit campaign group during the 2016 referendum, two judges have ruled.

A judgment issued last week said that a statement by the Electoral Commission was "misleading" in "asserting that it had never given advice that Vote Leave could lawfully make the donation it did."

The case relates to funds worth around £620,000, which were offered by Vote Leave to BeLeave, a separate group run by Darren Grimes, then a student activist. Mr Grimes asked for the money to be paid directly to AggregateIQ (AIQ), a Canadian IT company that carried out online targeted advertising...

To continue reading this article

Start a 30-day free trial for unlimited access to Premium articles

  • Unlimited access to Premium articles 
  • Subscriber-only events and experiences
  • Cancel any time

Free for 30 days

then only £2 per week

Save 25% with an annual subscription

Just £75 per year

 

Register for free and access one Premium article per week