You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Karti shall not be arrested till April 16 in Aircel-Maxis cases: Court

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

A day after securing from the in case, today got another relief from a city court which granted him protection from arrest till April 16 in Aircel-Maxis matter arising out of the 2G spectrum cases lodged by the and (ED).

O P Saini granted the relief to him considering that both the investigative agencies sought three weeks to file their responses on the anticipatory plea moved by Karti, son of former union P Chidambaram.

The court, which pronounced the order in a packed courtroom, also said that Karti shall not leave the country without its permission and will appear before the investigating as and when directed to join the investigation.

"Since three weeks' time is prayed for by the CBI, by submitting that during this shall prevail, apparently it means that as a matter of legal and judicial propriety, the applicant (Karti) shall not be arrested by the during the pendency of the instant application. This is in consonance with the provisions of section 41A of the CrPC.

"Accordingly, it is directed that in case presence of the applicant is required by the IO during three weeks' time prayed for by the senior PP for the CBI, he shall appear before the IO as and when directed and shall join the investigation," the said. An identical order was passed in the ED case too.

"Put up the application for reply by the CBI/ED and disposal on April 16 as prayed. Till then, the applicant shall not be arrested in the instant case," the said in the orders.

Arguing in the case earlier in the day, Kapil Sibal, appearing for Karti, said that there was neither any allegation against Karti in the Maxis case nor there was anything to show that he knew the (FIPB) officials.

He argued that Karti's name has not figured in any FIR in the case and he was only called by the as a witness in 2014.

"I am entitled to protection till the time they (CBI) demonstrate anything against me in the court," said.

Opposing his contention, Goel said the application of Karti was defective and not maintainable for interim relief.

In the ED case, senior Gopal Subramaniam, also appearing for Karti, argued that Karti has cooperated in the other matters as well and there was no question that he would flee the county or tamper with evidence.

ED Nitesh Rana too opposed the anticipatory plea and said Karti's have failed to demonstrate on what basis he apprehends his immediate arrest in the case.

"The application is wholly without merit," he said while seeking three weeks time to reply to the plea.

Former Finance P Chidambaram, also a senior himself, was present in the court room along with his wife seeking relief for his son. Both were in advocate's attire. While senior Chidambaram wore black coat and trousers, Nalini was seen wearing an advocate's black robe.

Besides them, a battery of senior lawyers appeared in the court for Karti, including Sibal, Subramanium, Salman Khurshid, also a leader, and to secure anticipatory for him.

During the hearing, also referred to the February 2, 2017 verdict of the court which had discharged former telecom and his brother in the Maxis case and said after this order, no FIR was lodged by the agencies.

Hours after being granted by the in the case, Karti had yesterday filed a plea seeking protection from arrest in the Aircel-Maxis matter, in which the and the (ED) have lodged cases in 2011 and 2012 respectively.

The matter pertains to grant of FIPB clearance to firm M/S Global Communication for investment in

In September 2015 the had filed its status report regarding probe into FIPB approvals in Maxis case. The agency had in June 2016 also issued notice to A Palaniappan, of Chess Management Services, a company promoted by Karti.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Sat, March 24 2018. 17:40 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU