You are here: Home » News-ANI » National
Business Standard

Kiran Bedi hails Madras HC decision to uphold 3 MLA appointments

ANI  |  Puducherry [India[ 

of hailed the Madras High Court's decision of accepting the appointment of three members of the

"It strengthens democracy, it strengthens and increases the presence in the It also encourages more debate", said.

The Madras on Thursday upheld the appointment of three MLA, declaring the nominations to be valid.

The first bench of the had passed a ruling saying as per Section 14(3) of the Union Territories Act the jurisdiction of a Union Territory lies with the and even the public does not have the right to stand against them.

3 MLAs- namely V. Saminathan, President of the BJP unit, and educationist S. Selva Ganapathy- were nominated by the of in 2017.

The nominations were later challenged in the by MLA Dhanalakshmi Narayan on the grounds that the appointments were done without consulting the of

As per Ravichandran, who represented MLA Dhanalakshmi Narayan, the nominations were challenged to be invalid as no consultative process was followed by the as per Section 44 of the Union Territories Act.

"My client who is a filed a requisition in the public interest. In accordance with the Union Territories 1963 Act (the), has to read as the of She filed that the appointing authorities only represent with respect to Union Territory as the Govt. of and the public does not have the right to stand against them." told ANI.

On the other hand Lawyer, V who represented the Union Government, said that as per the ruling by the the of a Union Territory has the right to nominate the MLAs in their state.

"In the matter, I stand for the Two requisitions were filed by MLA Lakshmi Narayan and another woman. They were dismissed and the nominations have been declared as invalid by the and Justice MN Sundaram as per Govt. of Union Territories Act 1963 239 and 239 (a) Sec 333. The acts say the or the has the power to nominate and also administer the oath", told ANI.

Earlier in 2017, had defended herself by saying that the three MLAs were nominated and administered the oath as per the law and blamed V Narayanasamy for launching a misleading campaign over it.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Thu, March 22 2018. 19:46 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU