You are here: Home » PTI Stories » National » News
Business Standard

Cannot compare Rafale deal with UPA's 126 MMRCA proposal: Sitharaman

The defence minister did not give a direct reply to a question on whether the costs under the Dassault Aviation's response to the RFP (request for proposal) were reconsidered in 2015

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

Rafale fighter aircraft deal scam
Indian Youth Congress activists shout slogans during a demonstration against BJP government over the alleged Rafale fighter aircraft deal scam, near Parliament House

The cost of 36 jets, being procured from France, cannot be "directly compared" with the original proposal to buy 126 combat during the government as "deliverables" were significantly different in the two cases, said today. Replying to questions relating to the deal in Rajya Sabha, she also said that EADS, the consortium of four European companies, had submitted "unsolicited offers on November 14, 2011 and July 5, 2014, after opening of the commercial bids for the procurement". The then government had floated a tender in 2007 for purchase of 126 medium multi-role combat (MMRCA) for the and, post negotiations, Dassault Aviation's and and EADS's Typhoon -- remained in the reckoning. However, the deal could not be finalised by the regime. "M/s DA (Dassault Aviation) was determined as L1 (lowest bidder) based on Total Cost of Acquisition (TCA).

The cost of 36 cannot be directly compared to the cost of original 126 proposal as deliverables are significantly different," Sitharaman said. The did not give a direct reply to a question on whether the costs under the Dassault Aviation's response to the RFP (request for proposal) were reconsidered in 2015 or at any other time. She also did not respond to another query by on whether life-cycle cost under the Eurofighter-Typhoon RFP was lower than Dassault Aviation's "RFP costs" in 2015. "M/s EADS had submitted unsolicited offers on November 14, 2011 and July 5,2014. The unsolicited offers of M/s EADS were received prior to withdrawal of RFP on June 24, 2015," she said. The has been attacking the government over the issue, claiming that the deal negotiated under its rule was much cheaper then the contract signed by the to procure 36 fighter jets from at a cost of Rs 58,000 crore. had inked an inter-governmental agreement with in September 2016 for procurement of 36 fighter jets at a cost of around Rs 58,000 crore, nearly one-and-a-half years after announced the proposal during a visit to The delivery of the jets is scheduled to begin from September 2019. The has also been demanding details of the deal, including per price, but the government has refused to share them, citing confidentiality provisions of a 2008 Indo-pact. Alleging corruption, the has been asking the government whether the per price of Rafale, according to international bids opened on December 12, 2012, comes to USD 80.95 million (Rs 526.1 crore) as against negotiated price of USD 241.66 Million (Rs 1,570.8 crore) for the 36 jets. Official sources claimed the original deal to procure 126 fighter jet could not go through during the rule despite reaching the final stage due to an intervention by the then A K Antony as he felt something wrong in the process. They said the government selected for procurement of the 36 fighter jets not because of the price arrived at during the tenure but due to the "overarching" assessment of the jet. The had also claimed that had purchased 12 fighter jets in November 2017 for USD 108.33 million per (Rs 694.80 crore), noting that the per rate at which the Gulf nation was buying the jet was much lower than the rate at which would procure them.

First Published: Mon, March 05 2018. 20:05 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU