Disclose bills of Air India charter plane for PM's travel abroad: CIC to MEA

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi 

The has directed the external affairs ministry to disclose records related to the expenses incurred on chartering aircraft for abroad visits of the from 2013 to 2017. R K Mathur rejected the contention of the ministry that details of the amount, reference numbers, dates of bills raised by and for the foreign visits undertaken by the are scattered across various records and files and collation of information in the manner sought by the appellant would involve searching of voluminous records by a significant number of officials. The case pertains to who had sought to know details of bills, invoices and other records related to abroad visits of between Financial Years 2013-14 and 2016-17. During the hearing, Batra said he was provided incomplete information by the ministry after which he approached the Commission which is the top appellate authority in matters pertaining to the Right to Information Act. He said he wanted the general public to be informed at what stage or with which public authority these bills and invoices are pending for payment. is a that does not make money.

Therefore, delay in settling these bills would also include sizable interest figure(s), which needs to be paid at the expense of tax payers money, Batra said. Batra said these records cannot be brushed aside in the garb of national security -- a clause which can be cited by a public authority to deny requested information -- because these are in the nature of the liabilities of the consumer(s) to pay back for the services rendered by After hearing both sides, Mathur said payment of outstanding dues would ultimately require collating of these bills and invoices and rejected the argument of the MEA that collation would disproportionately divert its resources. He said even if payment was made against these bills, it would have been done after compiling of bills/invoices. Further, whatever payment is to be made, it needs to be done after collecting the bills/invoices. In view of this, the Commission is of the opinion that the respondent (MEA) should provide to the appellant (Batra) relating to from FYs. 2013-14 to 2016-17, he said.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Tue, February 27 2018. 00:20 IST
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU