
In a major policy change pertaining to the Confidential Reports (CRs) of Army officers, the Military Secretary’s (MS) branch has announced that the box grading received by an officer from his immediate appraiser will not be shown to him/her henceforth. The MS Branch of the Army Headquarters has notified these changes in a policy letter issued on February 20, 2018 and addressed to all Commands of the Army. The letter, accessed by The Indian Express, states that the several changes in the CR form will come into effect from June 1, 2018.
As per the new policy the grading given to an appraisee by his appraiser, known as the Initiating officer (IO) in Army parlance, will now not be shown to him. ‘The IO/FTO (First Technical Officer) box have been shifted from the ‘open portion’ to the ‘closed portion’, the letter states. It was in early 1990s that a policy change took place and the grading given to an officer in his CR was made available to him to see before he signed his CR form. The Army HQs has justified the change made in the CR form now by saying that there has been a trend of ‘inflationary’ reporting in the CRs. This means that officers were being given higher grades which appeared unrealistic.
The letter states,” Aspects of inflationary trend in CRs and onerous responsibilities of reporting officers in ensuring objective assessment have been reiterated from time to time. However, it has been observed that inflationary trend in CRs continues to exhibit a steady rise,”. The policy letter adds that the issue came up for discussion in the Army Commander’s Conference held last year and thus the changes in the CR forms were being incorporated.
Lt Gen HS Panag (retd), former Northern and Central Army Commander said that there has been experimentation with the ‘open’ versus ‘closed’ system in the past too but there has not been an optimum result. “We have not been able to bring down inflationary reporting with the open system because of a lack of moral courage to tell the appraisee the truth regarding his performance. However, I doubt that a partially closed system, as it seems to have been recommended now, will also work,” he said.
Another important change which has been made in the CR form is in grading of certain personal qualities of the officers. These were known as ‘Star Qualities’ due to an Asterisk mark on them, signifying their importance. The special mark emphasising their importance has now been removed. This change will only be for officers above six years of service to the rank of Colonel.
Amendments have also been made in the chain of reporting for officers (Major to Colonel) of technical arms and services. Henceforth, if the IO /FTO and the Reviewing Officer or Higher Technical Officer (HTO) are the same then no figurative assessment will be made and only a pen picture of the asessee will be given. For officers of the rank of Brigadier and above, the box grading has been removed from the technical report in the CR forms.
In another important move amendments have been made in nthe form to achieve uniformity in recommendations for important career courses like Higher Command (HC), Higher defence Management Course (HDMC) and National Defence College (NDC). This has bene done because in internal assessements of the CRs it has been observed that a number of the reports were kept under observation due to incomplete or incorrect endorsement. Thie changes have also been made for the Command and Staff stream endorsement.
For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App
- Feb 27, 2018 at 12:33 pmChanges in policy of initiating ACR had always failed and will continue to fail mainly due to lack of moral courage and it is rather too late to instil it. It is,therefore, recommended that the ACR be simplified to the extent that the IO be asked to express his overall view of an officer whether he deserves an out of turn promotion, normal promotion or no promotion. If he chooses the latter then he ought to justify with evidence of repeated mistakes or serious/ dangerous mistake. Such a change had never been tried before and therefore be tried now.Reply
- Feb 27, 2018 at 12:20 pmThis is retrograde. Any appraisal system must be designed for the improvement of both the individual and the organization. This requires clear, objective assessments, feedback and a sign off by both the appraiser and the appraisee with the agreement of the appraiser's boss India is a colonial-feudal system where the hard to earn "respect" is replaced with rule by fear. Such as Parliamentary Privilege, Contempt of Court, Exceptions to the Rule Of Law, and the Confidential Appraisal.Reply
- Feb 27, 2018 at 11:25 amAfter the Army higher echelon has taken a decision and has implemented the revised CR system, ing comments by non affected Veterans is futile. Let us not forget, any appraisal system which is based on human relationship, is bound to suffer some draw backs. It is easy to blame the Commanding Officers of lack of moral courage in avoiding in ed ACRs. But, if he honestly reports about his subordinate officers performance, in which case, out of every ten officers, one will fall under the category of outstanding, one will be below average, and the the rest may occupy the slots of Above average, High average and average. If these reports are shown to the officers, then he can forget commanding the unit. His entire time will be wasted in commenting on non Statutory and statutory complaints filed by the affected officers. Let the serving fraternity discuss and debate on the issue. We have no role to play.Reply
- Feb 27, 2018 at 9:46 amThe existing system was fare enough oinary CR was due to lack of morale courage of IO. IO should b morally strong enough to tell the ratee of his strength n weekness. By doing so IO would b able to correct the ratee where ever it is needed. With the present change IO 's hands r made more stronger . Out come may encourage more sycophantic at ude of ratee officers.Reply
- Feb 27, 2018 at 8:45 amWill solve nothing ! In ionary reporting has been ins utionalised by the largest arm in the Army to garner its perception of the Lion's Share in General officer ranks. And that has nothing to do with the Assessee or Ratee, as the Army terms it. It is driven by reporting officers right to the pinnacle echelons. This is only lip service and eye wash.Reply
- Load More Comments