Log in

(MENAFN - The Conversation) The criminal justice system in England and Wales is failing victims and witnesses to such an extent that MPs say it is now '. Years of budget cuts and changes have led to a justice system .

With such a crisis at hand, one would expect some kind of 'strong and stable' leadership from the UK government. Yet, in the , the prime minister, Theresa May, once again appointed a new lord chancellor and secretary of state for justice, . Gauke is the sixth justice secretary since 2010, and Theresa May's third. He replaced just six months after he took up the role. Prior to that held the position for less than a year.

The is considered a major government department. Supported by 32 agencies and public bodies, is to protect and advance the principles of justice, while upholding the rule of law. In fact, the UK justice systems has long been '. An 'independent judiciary' with 'global lawyers', the 'brand' is recognised as 'internationally outstanding'. But the lack of consistent leadership is causing it to stall. Though there are permanent secretaries working within the ministry, it is the secretary of state who 'steers the ship', and maintains relationships and trust between the government and the judiciary.

The post of lord chancellor – now more commonly known as the secretary of state for justice – dates back to medieval times, when they were the supervision, preparation and dispatch of the king's letters, using the sovereign's seal. Prior to the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, the lord chancellor held . They were a senior judge, a member of cabinet, and presided over the house of lords.

Today the lord chancellor is an elected MP who holds the cabinet position of head of the ministry of justice. While they still have the ancient title of lord chancellor, the role focuses on the efficient functioning and independence of the courts, along with other important constitutional roles.

But constant changes at the top mean that the secretaries of state for justice have not fulfilled these roles. In the meantime, judges have been branded ' – with only to defend them – and their diversity has been .

On this latter point, in early 2018, David Lidington said that judicial diversity targets were to the issue. So what is? While the has a role to play in diversity matters, a secretary of state must be in place to set out the the government's position on what is a pressing matter. The judiciary should represent the people of society, and right now it is not doing so.

Looking to the front of house, England and Wales also needs a secretary to lead on a meaningful review of the consequences of the legal aid cuts, as well as their impact . Much of what is being recognised now as bringing the justice system to melting point is the consequence of years of these cuts. Again, a secretary with longevity in the role could lead on the future direction of justice policy within the UK, as well as keep justice issues .

Similarly, there is the impact of the extensive , which must be headed up by consistent ministerial leadership. The country needs someone to ensure adequate responsibility is taken for the decisions being made, and to ensure that access to justice is not restricted.

However, none of this should be taken to mean that just any MP should be handed the role of justice secretary simply because they will last in the job. The ministry of justice requires a secretary with an understanding of and the .

In recent years, secretaries have not even – although it must be noted that the appointment of Gauke, , has broken this recent trend, a fact which could see policies being led by his more intricate understanding of the law.

Without heeding these glaring warning signs now, the 'breaking point' could very quickly develop into a crack in England and Wales's legal system. Only with someone at the helm who can take long-term responsibility for overhauling the country's legal system can justice be truly served at all levels.

MENAFN301402201800490000ID1096407529