House Dem opposition mounts to budget deal

By Melanie Zanona and Mike Lillis -
House Dem opposition mounts to budget deal
© Greg Nash

Following the lead of Minority Leader Nancy PelosiNancy Patricia D'Alesandro PelosiGOP lawmaker: Dems not standing for Trump is 'un-American' Rep. Gutiérrez: 'Complete betrayal' if Pelosi backs budget caps deal without DACA Senate leaders say they're zeroing in on two-year budget deal MORE (D-Calif.), a growing number of rank-and-file House Democrats are saying they will oppose a budget deal unless they get a commitment from Speaker Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanMcConnell: 'Whoever gets to 60 wins' on immigration Overnight Defense: Latest on spending fight - House passes stopgap with defense money while Senate nears two-year budget deal | Pentagon planning military parade for Trump | Afghan war will cost B in 2018 House passes stopgap spending measure with defense money MORE (R-Wis.) for an immigration vote.

After huddling in the Capitol basement just hours before the government is set to close, House Democrats appeared to be leaning heavily against a sweeping bipartisan budget deal to keep the government open, despite the deal's endorsement by Senate Democratic leaders. They are citing the absence of a commitment from Ryan to vote on legislation to protect the “Dreamers,” young immigrants brought to the country illegally as kids.

Pelosi supports the underlying budget deal — indeed, she helped to craft it — but is withholding her support unless Ryan guarantees a vote to shore up the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which President TrumpDonald John TrumpTillerson: Russia already looking to interfere in 2018 midterms Dems pick up deep-red legislative seat in Missouri Speier on Trump's desire for military parade: 'We have a Napoleon in the making' MORE is terminating in the first week of March.

By all accounts, Pelosi is not twisting the arms of her troops to join the opposition. But in making her case during Thursday’s meeting, she seemed to be having a persuasive effect.

“I woke up this morning thinking I was a yes, because I’m pleased with the many things that are in it,” Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) said leaving the meeting.

“On the other hand really the only leverage we have right now is not giving Paul Ryan our votes, if he doesn’t need them.”

Beyer said he’s now voting no.

“Anyone who underestimates Pelosi’s ability to influence the Democratic caucus shouldn’t be in the business that you’re in,” said Rep. Brad ShermanBradley (Brad) James ShermanThe Trump Presidency: Year One House Dem pledges impeachment vote after Trump's 'sh--hole countries' remark Trump earns praise for support of Iranian protesters MORE (D-Calif.).  “Pelosi is a very persuasive person.”

The Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) officially announced it would oppose the budget caps deal following the Thursday night meeting.

The legislative game of chicken comes over a bipartisan budget deal that would set the stage to boost federal spending for defense and nondefense programs by $300 billion over the next two years and raise the debt ceiling for one year. It would fund the government until March 23, which will give lawmakers time to write an omnibus spending bill for the rest of the fiscal year.

 The deal also includes a number of other priorities for both parties, including money for disaster relief, the opioid crisis, the Children's Health Insurance Program and community health centers.

With dozens of conservatives poised to oppose the budget deal over deficit spending concerns, Ryan and House GOP leaders will be forced to reach across the aisle for Democratic votes. The exact math remains unclear, but Rep. Dennis RossDennis Alan RossCongress must use its tools to block consumer bureau’s payday loan rule The Hill's 12:30 Report Bill to ease Dodd-Frank rules gets chilly reception in House MORE (R-Fla.), a senior member of the GOP whip team, predicted the Republicans would need around 75 Democrats to get the budget deal over the finish line.

But Rep. G.K. ButterfieldGeorge (G.K.) Kenneth ButterfieldBlack Dems take lead in push to impeach Trump Judiciary advances 17 judicial nominees Facebook appoints American Express CEO as first black board member MORE (D-N.C.), former head of the Congressional Black Caucus, estimated that less than 40 Democrats would support the bill.

“They’re going to get to 175, 180, and they’re going to hit a ceiling,” said Butterfield, former head of the Congressional Black Caucus. “And then Speaker Ryan is going to panic and then he’s got to make a decision whether to shut the vote down and let the government shut down, or make a very benign commitment – and that is to debate the DACA, the Dreamer bill.”

“If he were to call on our leaders in a few minutes and make it crystal clear that he is willing to entertain floor debate on DACA, then I think he’ll get the votes to pass it,” he added.

With GOP leaders needing at least dozens of Democratic votes to avoid a shutdown, the growing feeling among many Democrats is that this is their chance to use their leverage to get concessions from Ryan on immigration.

“I just feel like, at some point, we just have to stand up because it’s the right thing to do,” said Rep. Jan SchakowskyJanice (Jan) Danoff SchakowskyOvernight Tech: Uber exec says 'no justification' for covering up hack | Apple considers battery rebates | Regulators talk bitcoin | SpaceX launches world's most powerful rocket Overnight Regulation: EPA sued over water rule delay | House passes bill to ease ObamaCare calorie rule | Regulators talk bitcoin | Patient groups oppose FDA 'right to try' bill House passes bill to ease menu labeling rules under ObamaCare MORE (D-Ill.), who grew emotional and began tearing up as she spoke. “We have leverage now. They don’t have the votes.”

“Just tell us that you’ll have a vote [on DACA.] Not even that it will pass,” she added.

Schakowsky added that Pelosi’s marathon House floor speech on Wednesday “wasn’t for nothing, when she stood for eight hours.”

Immigration is not the only issue causing Democrats to balk. A number of lawmakers said they simply can’t support the hike in defense spending, which was demanded by GOP leaders in a bid to win over conservative support.

“They’re spending money on defense that the army didn’t ask for,” said Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.). “These people have gone wild.”

Asked how many Democrats would support the measure, Cleaver was terse.

“Not many,” he said. “Probably not enough to make it go.”

Pelosi has come under fire from immigrant rights advocates since the 2018 budget fight began last September. The critics contend she didn’t fight hard enough to force a DACA provision onto short-term spending bills when the Democrats had leverage. Pelosi’s marathon speech Wednesday urging Ryan to act on DACA was meant, at least in part, to assure the critics that the fate of the Dreamers is a top priority.

Still, Democratic leaders are not whipping the vote. Rep. Kurt SchraderWalter (Kurt) Kurt SchraderHouse passes concealed carry gun bill House to vote on highway bill amendment to allow heavier trucks Push for biennial budgets wins House majority MORE (Ore.), a Blue Dog Democrat who expressed concern with the hundreds of billions of dollars in increased deficit spending in the package, said Pelosi applied no pressure.

”Do what you want to do, she said,” Schrader relayed.

Leaving the meeting, Rep. Cedric RichmondCedric Levon RichmondBlack Dems take lead in push to impeach Trump Congressional Black Caucus chair: Members will 'stare racism in the face' at Trump SOTU House rejects Democratic effort to impeach Trump as shutdown looms MORE (D-La.), head of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), bashed the Republicans for “offering a false choice” between shoring up DACA and funding the government.

“That’s a stupid choice,” Richmond said, heading into another meeting of CBC members in search of a position.

The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), meanwhile, is releasing a whip notice Thursday night urging its liberal members to oppose the package, largely over Ryan’s inaction on DACA.

“If he hasn’t put it on the table, it’s a non-starter,” said Rep. Mark PocanMark William PocanThis week: Trump delivers State of the Union amid immigration fight Ryan challenger to attend State of the Union as Dem lawmaker's guest House Dems want to give cities the right to build broadband networks MORE (D-Wis.), who heads the  CPC.

To be sure, not all Democrats are opposing the budget package, which includes a host provisions they favor.

Rep. Bennie ThompsonBennie Gordon ThompsonBlack Dems take lead in push to impeach Trump House Dems ask DHS for details of voter fraud investigation takeover Dems want answers on White House security clearance process MORE (D-Miss.), a CBC member, said he’s supporting the package for a simple reason.

“I like the stuff that’s in it,” he said.

Rep. John YarmuthJohn Allen YarmuthHouse Dems see shutdown as inevitable Red state Dem: Trump has 'committed impeachable offenses' Congress reeling from sexual harassment deluge MORE (Ky.), ranking member of the Budget Committee, is also supporting the package, but strongly suggested he’s in the minority within the Caucus. If Republicans need 75 Democrats to pass the bill, “that might be questionable,” he said.

“If it’s less, probably more likely,” Yarmuth said.

And Rep. Al LawsonAlfred (Al) James LawsonLawmakers put their beer brewing skills to test for charity MORE, a Florida Democrat, also said he was leaning towards supporting the package because of the disaster aid for hurricane-ravaged regions like his home state.

Rep. Jackie SpeierKaren (Jackie) Lorraine Jacqueline SpeierSpeier on Trump's desire for military parade: 'We have a Napoleon in the making' House passes landmark bill to overhaul sexual harassment policy on Capitol Hill Democrat: It’s like Putin gave Trump a ‘script’ MORE (D-Calif.) said Democrats were “split” over the deal and predicted that some of them would back the package, but declined to say how many.

Many Democrats were careful not tip their hands as GOP leaders scramble to lock down the votes.

“People are convinced that we shouldn’t be broadcasting where we are right now,” Schakowsky said.

Updated at 9:32 p.m.