Will treat Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid row as land dispute, says SC

IANS  |  New Delhi 

The on Thursday said it will deal with the Ramjanmabhoomi-case as a pure land dispute and refused to hear it on a day-to-day basis.

Meanwhile, the All Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), which is beginning a crucial three-day plenary in on Friday, demanded contempt of court proceedings against those speaking of building a Ram temple at the site of the razed in

Beginning the hearing, a special bench of Dipak Misra, Justice and Justice posted it for March 14, asking parties in the case to file English translations of the documents before it.

After Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for one of the petitioners, sought day-to-day hearings, the bench refused saying: "Over 700 poor litigants are waiting for justice, we have to hear them."

The court also said it will hear at later stage the of those which were not before the

The court was hearing a batch of cross petitions challenging the 2010 verdict that had divided, in by a 2:1 majority, the disputed Babri Masjid-Ramjanambhoomi site between the Nirmohi Akhara, Lord Ram deity and the

Tushar Mehta, appearing for the government, told the court that 504 exhibits, including books such as the Ram Charit Manas, Ramayana and Bhagawat Gita, written in various languages, have been translated and filed in the court.

The depositions of 87 witnesses have also been filed along with the Archaeological Survey of India's reports as well as photographs.

However, some translations are yet to be completed, he added.

The top court was moved challenging the High Court verdict by petitioners M. Siddiqui, represented by his legal heirs, the Nirmohi Akhara, the UP Sunni Central Waqf Board, Bhagwan Shri Ram Virajman, All Hindu Mahasabha's Swami Chakrapani, the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha, the Akhil Bharatiya Sri Ramjanam Bhoomi Punardhar Samiti and others.

Addressing reporters ahead of the AIMPLB meet, its said those speaking of building a grand Ram temple at the site represented a "clear case of contempt of court" and that the court and the government should take action.

He said the Board would present its case before the and abide by its verdict.

--IANS

gt-ms/vd/mr

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

First Published: Thu, February 08 2018. 19:36 IST