When Kiri Pomery ordered a red Santa Claus hat from Amazon.com Inc’s new Australian operation, the estimated delivery time to her address in outback Western Australia seemed too good to be true.

It was.

Several weeks after the end of Amazon’s Jan. 10 delivery window and a month after Christmas, the manager of the Ora Banda Historical Inn had still had not received her package.

“Generally it is pretty reliable,” said Pomery, referring to the nearest post office, a 45-minute drive away in the gold mining town of Kalgoorlie, where she collects her mail. “I think we have had one thing in the last four years that we have had to go looking for.” On the other side of the country, at a pub she manages with her husband, Lester, in the spinifex plains of far western Queensland state, Valerie Cain got her Santa hat in time to wrap it as a Christmas gift for her six-month-old grandson Oscar. The hat arrived just two days into Amazon’s 20-day estimated delivery window.

A third parcel bound for the tiny township of Yuendumu, in Central Australia’s Western Desert, arrived nine days after Amazon’s delivery window.

Reuters ordered the hats in December to check Amazon Australia’s shipping estimates. And the experiences of three of the company’s first customers reflect what analysts see as the main challenge to capitalising on a lack of serious online competition and winning over the world’s 12th-largest economy: its geography.

Australia has the developed world’s most spread-out population, with 24 million people on an island roughly the size of the mainland United States. Yet there is little inland transport infrastructure, making it hard for Amazon to live up to its promise of reliable shipping times.

Amazon can generally reach customers in far-flung parts of North America and Asia quickly by using income from its subscription service, Prime, to bankroll its own delivery vehicles. The company has said it plans to offer Prime in Australia sometime in 2018.

“Retailers that have been here and have had an online offer for the last 10 years are all struggling,” said Shanaka Jayasinghe, a manager at logistics consultant GRA Supply Chain Pty Ltd.

If a company is trying to ship to all of Australia, “offering same day or next day, it’s a challenge in our market,” Jayasinghe added, referring to shipping times.

Kogan.com Ltd, a local e-tailer which has styled itself after Amazon, says it delivers nationwide in 14 days or less. Amazon Australia’s longest estimated shipping time is 10 days. Both offer disclaimers that delivery may take longer in remote areas.

Third-party vendors sell about 90 per cent of the goods advertised on Amazon’s Australian website while Amazon itself sells the rest, said Daniel Mueller, an analyst at Vertium Asset Management, which holds Australian retail shares. That ratio is reversed in Amazon’s other markets, Mueller added, providing speedier service.

Flipkart

Amazon’s biggest challenges in Asia so far have involved competition from entrenched local players like China’s Alibaba Group Holding Ltd, Singapore’s Carousell Pte Ltd and India’s Flipkart Online Services Pvt Ltd.

By contrast, Australia has low online shopping penetration and lack of well-resourced rivals. Analysts estimate Australian online shopping is worth about 10 per cent of its A$300 billion brick-and-mortar retail sector, compared with China, where a quarter of sales are projected to be online by 2020.

But it’s too early to tell how much of a disrupting force Amazon will be Down Under. Since its launch on Dec. 5, 2017, Amazon has never been Australia’s most-searched retail brand, according to Google data.

From Dec. 12 to Jan. 7, Australians looked online more often for Myer Holdings Ltd, a 118-year-old department store chain with a market capitalisation of A$540 million ($431 million) and a steady run of profit warnings, than they did for $630 billion Amazon.

Jayasinghe said Amazon’s Australian strategy will probably follow what it did in Canada, whose geography and economy share similarities with Australia. He predicted Amazon’s Australian arm would have up to five warehouses nationwide by 2020, compared with one currently, giving the company more control of delivery.

Drones, which Amazon is testing, may also help get goods to Australia’s hard-to-reach areas without relying on an inconsistent regional transport network.

An Amazon Australia spokeswoman referred questions about the Santa hats to a customer service operator in Hyderabad, India, who attributed the delay to the seller’s using a slow shipping service to Sydney.

The seller of the A$8.95 hats, listed on Amazon’s website as China-based Hommee-AU, told Reuters that the three items were sent in different batches because they were destined for different places.

One arrived in Sydney in just six days. But Hommee-AU said the others were held up in a “Christmas jam” of parcels by customs checks at the airport, as well as “some uncontrollable factors like weather or something else.” The Australian Border Force, the government body responsible for inbound parcel checks, said it experienced no delays in December.

Australia Post declined to comment. It has said it delivered a monthly record of 37 million parcels, including non-Amazon items, in the December lead-up to Christmas, up nearly a fifth compared with the same month a year earlier.

Amazon’s Australia country manager, Rocco Braeuniger, said the company planned to introduce its own distribution system in Australia, to provide “the best possible delivery experience.” “We will continue to develop and invest in our business in Australia and the result will be an ever-improving customer experience,” he said in an emailed statement, which did not say when Amazon would launch its delivery service.

Meanwhile, the one hat that arrived swiftly made for a happy first Christmas for Valerie Cain’s grandson, Oscar, in rural Queensland.

“We wrapped it up for him, he’s 6 months old and it fitted him perfect,” Cain said.

Meanwhile,  US online retailer amazon said on Monday that it had settled a major tax claim in France and would start declaring all its earnings in the country locally, as European officials prepare to tighten the fiscal screws on digital economy giants.

amazon did not reveal how much it had paid over a French claim for nearly 200 million euros ($249 million) covering the period from 2006 to 2010.

It is one of the American technology giants in the line of fire in Europe over their tax-avoidance strategies, which often seem to route their income through low-tax nations -- in amazon’s case, Luxembourg.

French President Emmanuel Macron has proposed a new mechanism for taxing US tech giants that would take into account the volume of sales generated in each European country, rather than on the profits that are booked through low-tax countries.

amazon announced a similar deal with Italy in December, paying 100 million euros to settle an investigation into suspected tax evasion from 2011 to 2015, while also agreeing to declare its income locally.

In 2012, amazon revealed that it had been hit with a 198-million-euro tax bill in France for back taxes, interest and penalties relating to income spread between different jurisdictions.

At the time, the company had said it disagreed with the French assessment and vowed to “vigorously” fight it.

In its statement Monday, amazon said it had created a French subsidiary for its European operations in August 2015, “with all retail revenues, expenses, profits and taxes due now accounted for in France.”

The retailer also said it had invested over 2 billion euros in France since 2010, creating more than 5,500 jobs.

European officials have vowed to make digital economy giants pay a greater share of their taxes in the countries where they earn their profits.

Under current EU law, companies based outside the bloc can declare their earnings from across the 28-nation market in a single country.

That has not led them to pick low-tax nations like Ireland, the Netherlands or Luxembourg -- depriving other member states of revenues, even though they may account for a bigger share of the earnings.

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development says such rules cost governments around the world as much as $240 billion (193 billion euros) a year in lost revenue, according to a 2015 estimate.