Another damning story of the FBI emerged Saturday in the New York Times, regarding its investigation of Dr. Larry Nassar.
Breaking News: FBI offices in 3 cities were told that Larry Nassar had molested elite gymnasts. But nearly a year later, gymnastics officials became concerned about the slow pace of the case. During that time, over 2 dozen girls and women were molested. https://t.co/wj6ud1xMDW
— The New York Times (@nytimes) February 3, 2018
The New York Times reports on the glacial pace of the FBI’s investigation:
But as the inquiry moved with little evident urgency, a cost was being paid. The New York Times has identified at least 40 girls and women who say that Dr. Nassar molested them between July 2015, when he first fell under F.B.I. scrutiny, and September 2016, when he was exposed by an Indianapolis Star investigation. Some are among the youngest of the now-convicted predator’s many accusers — 265, and counting.
…
The silence at times drove the victims and their families to distraction, including Gina Nichols, the mother of the gymnast initially known as “Athlete A”: Maggie Nichols, who was not contacted by the F.B.I. for nearly 11 months after the information she provided sparked the federal inquiry.
Would you believe that people are upset not with the FBI but with The New York Times and its choice to run an anti-FBI story now?
Really? FBI bashing at this time?? Very interesting.
— Doctor Evil (@DrStrangeLohv) February 3, 2018
Interesting timing of this FBI bashing story…why did gymnastics officials wait so long to do anything when they knew for years this was going on?? https://t.co/fCxwV0DmHi
— Its Obvious (@MIRosebud) February 3, 2018
This is unbelievable, you're trying to discredit the FBI to help a criminal treasonous party keep their power? HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THIS?! How is this on the FBI?! They have procedures to follow! Place the blame where it belongs! The guardians of these girls failed, end of story.
— Scott (@Phins4Ev) February 3, 2018
The political intent here is so naked, shameless!
— LaissezFaire (@famous35) February 3, 2018
NYT doing Trumps dirty work
— obamadailywire™ (@obamadailywire) February 3, 2018
@nytimes this is very irresponsible reporting at best.
— Miss D. (@Ditzy_horse) February 3, 2018
This article is very irresponsible. Fuck you, @nytimes https://t.co/hlZTMGOc9C
— nicksevens (@nicksevens) February 3, 2018
Beware of propaganda. https://t.co/7eJRsDYLlZ
— Mavis Emory (@MCEmory) February 3, 2018
The war on the FBI begins… https://t.co/asrDIcv8TO
— Mike Fraser (@bcmikejetsfan) February 3, 2018
Have to wonder if this was intentionally designed to further erode confidence in the FBI? Coincidence? https://t.co/ROJSP67GSh
— Joyce Faraone (@factsfaraone) February 3, 2018
There is a smear campaign going on against the FBI. https://t.co/KsqHTuFFu2
— AJ (@thisguy_aljahai) February 3, 2018
Ahhhh. NYT doing Drumpf's dirty work again….
— ORANGE isthe NEWBLUE (@blueorangeny) February 3, 2018
WHY is the @NYtimes trying to discredit the @FBI suddenly?? https://t.co/VwDLK14UiJ
— Ms. Hart (@hartsigns) February 3, 2018
@NYtimes tries to discredit @FBI for #TrumpRussia WOWOWOWOWWOW https://t.co/VwDLK14UiJ
— Ms. Hart (@hartsigns) February 3, 2018
Here it comes. Now the FBI will be under attack nonstop. Coincidence?
— anthony biafore (@stoneman28) February 3, 2018
Ok- is this true? If so outrageous. Or is this a well timed story designed to attack the FBI at THIS particular moment of memo-induced insanity against FBI?
— Robin (@heartroar17) February 3, 2018
Go home NYT, you're drunk, high and a hot mess lately.
— Allison (@holocen3) February 3, 2018
@sergenyt you guys think this is the time to come out with this article? Couldn’t sit on it a month? Molesting happened. It’s not like this is dropping while the guy is still molesting people.
— Brian (me think me a stable genius) (@Bri_N_GiO) February 3, 2018
But you’ll drop a anti-fbi article one day after the attacks on the fbi? What’s the matter with you? Shame!!
— Brian (me think me a stable genius) (@Bri_N_GiO) February 3, 2018
Quit giving red meat to the GOP … blaming the FBI
— Emi Smith (@EmiSmith9) February 3, 2018
From NYT to 45’s twitter feed in 5…4…3…2…
I’m done with NYT shenanigans.
— MizpahMoon 💕🔸💕🔸💕🔸 (@EkbMary) February 3, 2018
Why release this now? It’s obvious a pro-Trump/Putin is using this to trash the intelligence community to protect Trump’s crimes.
— e•λ (@elamison) February 3, 2018
So now Republicans are trying everything to discredit our FBI. i like my cops, FBI, CIA, and military stop making them look bad.
— Adolfo (@mixteca_mictlan) February 3, 2018
Attacking the FBI now? What did Trump pay you?
— Haley Jenifer (@haleyjen) February 3, 2018
The GOP propaganda machine is ramping up, it seems. Interesting timing.
— Anne American 🗽 (@missnastywoman) February 3, 2018
You are now working for Trump?!
— deco-daze.com (@AndreaKollo) February 3, 2018
WHAT ARE YOU DOING NY TIMES?? This seems quite convenient for you to do today? So your saying the FBI is responsible for EVERYTHING that has gone wrong in America? They keep America safe, take the lead on present danger like mass murder and kidnapping, expose corruption (1 of 2) https://t.co/ff92X0ci6j
— Isabella Lena (@ivotekindness) February 3, 2018
within our borders, and now add dumb mistakes made by many upstanding institutions that should have had their own governing policies in place to protect them? Should we also blame them for sororities, fraternities, and bullying? Do you want the constitution to fail? (2 of 2)
— Isabella Lena (@ivotekindness) February 3, 2018
Some good advice here …
These comments illustrate a damning breakdown of humanity & sense of justice in the face of cheap partisan politics. If your first thought seeing this is "NYT is trying to discredit the FBI to help Trump!" & not "this is a gross miscarriage of justice," take a step back. Reflect. https://t.co/TK9mOVFcve
— Tiana Lowe (@TianaTheFirst) February 3, 2018
Related:
Peter Daou and company FREAK OUT over the New York Times’ Cecile Richards tweet
‘OMFG SHUT UP’: New York Times HAMMERED over call to hear from Trump voters
