Winston Churchill biofic 'The Darkest Hour' is perhaps a little guilty of liberally abusing the facts to support its message
Winston Churchill biofic 'The Darkest Hour' is perhaps a little guilty of liberally abusing the facts to support its message Credit: Jack English/Focus Features

In a film, as in a relationship, there’s usually a definable moment when you know it’s all over. Someone says or does something that’s so preposterous, it takes a moment to sink in. So you start looking around wildly, disbelievingly, hoping you’ve misunderstood, and when you realise you haven’t, the lift shaft plummets in your stomach. Shortly after, that is when you walk out.

I had to be physically restrained from walking out of the Darkest Hour. For those of you haven’t yet seen Joe Wright’s otherwise brilliant Winston Churchill biopic – or indeed read Charles Moore’s equally brilliant Spectator piece on why he refuses to see the film – then, spoiler alert, there is a scene towards the end when, on June 4th 1940, Churchill is en route to the Commons without the faintest idea of what he’s going to say.

So far, so far from believable it’s not even funny. And it gets worse.

Unable to decide...

To continue reading this article

Start a 30-day free trial for unlimited access to Premium articles

  • Unlimited access to Premium articles 
  • Subscriber-only events and experiences
  • Cancel any time

Free for 30 days

then only £2 per week

Save 25% with an annual subscription

Just £75 per year

 

Register for free and access one Premium article per week