Johannesburg - With President Jacob Zuma’s job on the line, opposition parties the UDM and Cope are worried that he will not have the money to pay for his state capture court appeal.
The parties have filed a security for costs application, demanding that Zuma pay R1m upfront before the appeal can be heard.
"The applicant (Zuma) is also facing a real prospect of impeachment and/or removal from office and/or criminal prosecution within the next few weeks or months - each of which may have prospects of severely and adversely affecting his ability to pay his costs liabilities in the likely event of the application for leave to appeal and/or appeal itself being unsuccessful," the UDM and Cope state in their papers.
READ: UDM, Cope want Zuma to pay R1m upfront for state capture appeal
On December 13, a full Bench of the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria unanimously found that Zuma's application to have former Public Protector Thuli Madonsela's recommendations on alleged state capture reviewed, was ill-advised and reckless.
Zuma lost his application for the review and setting aside of the recommended remedial actions contained in Madonsela's State of Capture report, which also called for Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng to choose the judge to head the commission of inquiry into state capture.
He has since appealed the costs order as well as the order regarding the duties of the president to appoint a commission of inquiry. The parties argue that Zuma’s appeal is further "abuse of the process of the court".
While Zuma has appointed a commission of inquiry and complied with the court order, he said in a statement: "I have only appealed the orders to the extent that they set a particular precedent for the Office of the President of the Republic and are indeed deserving of legal certainty.
READ: #StateCapture judgment: 13 blows dealt to Zuma, quote by quote
"The allegations that the state has been wrestled out of the hands of its real owners, the people of South Africa, [are] of paramount importance and are therefore deserving of finality and certainty.
"Accordingly, I have decided that, while the issues determined by the order require final determination by higher courts, this matter cannot wait any longer."
The opposition parties said: "The application for leave to appeal is an extension of the reckless conduct identified in the judgment."
Cope and the UDM claim Zuma already owes them R5m for the previous court challenge he lost. The other respondents in the case are the EFF, DA, Public Protector and Vytjie Mentor.
UDM and Cope have warned that, if Zuma fails to pay up, they will go to court to stop his appeal.
